Commit Graph
75 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ReaperOfVeriod 6d26da3630 The control fails my own claim: 0x1c/0x34 select nothing distinctive
2ff2abb ended by implying that the class-header offsets point at identifiable
content. I said the next step would be a control. Here it is, and it fails the
claim.

Adjacent-equal-byte rate over 64 bytes, 1,864 classes:

    0x1c     0.12688
    0x34     0.12106
    control  0.14109    (the same offset + 0x2000)
    random   0.00391

All three are ~30x above the random baseline, so the region is structured data
and not noise. That part stands. But 0x1c and 0x34 are no more structured than an
arbitrary offset in the same blob, and 0x34 is slightly *less*.

So the hex fragments in 2ff2abb were three hand-picked examples from a structured
region. "They look like compiled shader programs with small-integer parameters"
said something about this part of core_data, not about what those fields address.
That is exactly the rule 4 failure -- a pattern that reads as meaningful with no
control to test it against -- and I wrote it anyway while explicitly declining to
name a format two paragraphs earlier.

RETRACTED: the suggestion that the offset targets are identifiable content.

Unaffected, because it was measured differently: the offsets are base-relative,
non-zero, in range on 1,864 of 1,864 classes, and always land past the class's
own tie packet blocks. What they address is still unknown. The earlier finding
that the packet's control region is not a tag stream also stands -- that was
measured by uniformity within the packet, not by comparison to elsewhere in
core_data.

A TEST THAT CAUGHT ITS OWN AUTHOR

The first version asserted |0x1c - control| < 0.02 symmetrically, and failed on
0x34 at a gap of 0.0200. The correct response was not to loosen the number until
it went green. The claim being guarded is "these offsets select distinctive
content", and a gap in the *other* direction does not support it -- both offsets
came out below control. So the assertion is one-sided, and the comment says why,
including that the symmetric form was the wrong shape.

That is the AGENTS 3b discipline working in the direction it is meant to: a
failing assertion is information about the assertion.

282 passing with the disc present (23 + 19 + 62 + 156 + 22; disc binary 35.16s),
clippy clean.
2026-10-14 05:06:57 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 2ff2abbd32 Two class-header words are base-relative offsets pointing past the tie packets
Chasing where the AD-GIF is, since f43a1c2 established it is not in the packet.
Two of the undecoded class-header words are offsets.

base + 0x1c and base + 0x34 land inside core_data on 1,864 of 1,864 classes, so
both are relative to the class base rather than absolute, and both are non-zero
on every class. Both also land **past** that class's own tie packet blocks on
every class, so they address per-class data held elsewhere in core_data rather
than the tie geometry.

That is consistent with f43a1c2: if the packet's own control region is not a tag
stream, the per-class draw state is referenced from somewhere else.

WHAT IS THERE, AND WHAT IS NOT CLAIMED

The bytes are structured, not random -- class 3 shows a fixed-stride table with
`80 01 00` recurring, class 2's field is a monotone byte table, class 5's has
`38 38 38` and `ff 00 ff ff`. They read like compiled shader programs with
small-integer parameters, or lookup tables.

**Not identified, and deliberately not named.** None of those three fragments has
been run against a control, and all three were picked because they looked like
something. That is precisely the finding rule 4 refuses, and having spent this
session on four retractions I would rather record an honest "structured,
unidentified" than a plausible format that has not earned it. If any of these
turns out to be a shader program the next step is a control, not a better-looking
hex dump.

ALSO SETTLED

0x24 is demonstrably not an offset: only 17 of 1,864 of its values land in range
for core_data. Recorded as packed data. 0x28, 0x2c, 0x38 remain high-entropy and
unexplained.

281 passing with the disc present (23 + 19 + 61 + 156 + 22), clippy clean.
2026-10-14 05:03:34 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod f43a1c2e6e bfc_distance is not the control region's length; the AD-GIF is not in the packet
Follows 9bb04cc. The control region is now characterised, and the second half of
the answer is a correction to a field doc that has been wrong since the record
was first parsed.

WHAT THE CONTROL REGION IS

Per-record, not shared state. 12,294 distinct blobs across 13,042 records, mixed
within 2,410 of 3,549 classes, and different between LOD 0 and LOD 1 on all 500
classes that have both. It varies per primitive.

Partitioned by its own length, it is not uniform in character, and the pooled
count hid that:

    vert_ofs  48 bytes  (3 qw)      5 distinct blobs
    vert_ofs  64 bytes  (4 qw)  3,175
    vert_ofs  80 bytes  (5 qw)  4,309
    vert_ofs  96 bytes  (6 qw)  3,281
    vert_ofs 112 bytes  (7 qw)  1,523
    vert_ofs 128 bytes  (8 qw)      1

The shortest and longest are effectively constant -- five blobs, and one -- while
everything between is per-record unique. That is a shape, not a noise floor, and
it is invisible unless the measurement is partitioned by length.

THE CORRECTION

bfc_distance == 5 * shader_count holds on every record, and the field doc has
always read "quadwords of ad-gif data" -- which read as a packet-relative length
would make it the control region's size.

It cannot be that. bfc_distance is 5..20 quadwords; vert_ofs, the control region,
is 3..8.

Pooled, they overlap on 9,315 of 15,219 records -- 61%, a number describing
nothing. Partitioned by shader_count, as AGENTS 3a requires, it is exact:

    shader_count 1: 2,772 of 8,676 exceed  (32%)
    shader_count 2: 4,649 of 4,649 exceed  (100%)
    shader_count 3: 1,729 of 1,729 exceed  (100%)
    shader_count 4:   165 of   165 exceed  (100%)

Without exception for two or more shaders. For one shader it exceeds exactly when
vert_ofs is below 5, which is that 32%.

**The AD-GIF is not stored in the tie packet.** The packet is control, vertices
and scissor, in that order. bfc_distance is a per-record quantity tied to the
shader count whose meaning is still not established, and the "quadwords of ad-gif
data" reading of it is wrong. The doc now says so and says why, rather than
carrying a plausible description of a field whose meaning nobody has established.

This is the fourth retraction today and the second today found by partitioning
rather than by a test failing. The pooled number was not merely less precise than
the partitioned ones -- it pointed the other way, because 61% looks like noise and
100% looks like a boundary. Had I accepted the pooled figure I would have written
"sometimes" and moved on.

59 disc tests, 278 total across 23 + 19 + 59 + 156 + 22 with the disc present
(disc binary 35.31s), clippy clean.
2026-10-14 04:57:41 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 9bb04cca7b The tie control region is not a VIF or GIF tag stream; and vert_ofs is mis-named
Went after the GS's GIF packets in the tie AD-GIF region. Got a negative result,
a new universal invariant, and a retraction of my own first probe, which reached
the right answer for the wrong reason twice.

THE NEGATIVE RESULT

Tried the leading `5 * shader_count` quadwords of each packet (the
`bfc_distance` field's stated meaning) as VIF tags -- command in bits 0-6, size
in 7-14, mark in 15 -- and as GIF tags -- type in the top byte of word 1, length
in bits 0-2 of word 0. Both uniform. Over 13,042 records: 10,443 distinct values
of word 0, no GIF tag type above a count of 2. That is the control result rule 4
asks for, and it says stop.

THE RETRACTION

The first probe scanned `bfc_distance` quadwords, which for most records
overruns `vert_ofs` and runs into the vertex data. Pooling a control region with
vertex positions -- two populations with different structure -- gives a uniform
answer, so "not a tag stream" came out right from a measurement that was
measuring the wrong bytes. That is exactly the rule 3a failure, and I only caught
it because the hex dump I took next looked structured while the histogram said
random.

Re-measuring quadword 0 alone, on its own population, gives the same uniformity.
The conclusion survives; the reasoning did not, and both are recorded.

THE PARTITION, AND A NEW INVARIANT

The hex dump showed the packet layout directly:

    q[0 .. vert_ofs)            control        3..8 quadwords, peak at 5
    q[vert_ofs .. +vert_size)   vertices
    q[vert_ofs+vert_size ..]    scissor

and `scissor_ofs == vert_ofs + vert_size` holds on **15,219 of 15,219** records
across all 27 levels, including every one whose strip_count is non-zero. That is a
derived quantity stored explicitly, and it holds everywhere -- which is the check
that confirms the three regions really are laid out the way the existing packet
length formula assumed. It is now a hard check in invariants_hold(), which is
something the previous four could not be.

The fixture in tie.rs failed the moment I added it: it had vert_ofs 4 and
vert_size 0x20 with scissor_ofs 0x30, which is 4 + 0x24. The synthetic data was
never constrained by a relation that did not exist yet. Fixed to 0x24.

vert_ofs IS MIS-NAMED

It is not a vertex offset. It is the *length* of the leading control region, and
the vertex data begins at that many quadwords into the packet. The field name
stays because the on-disc order is fixed and everything already written about this
record says vert_ofs, but the doc now states what the value is and gives the
distribution.

STILL UNKNOWN

What the control region contains. Not standard DMA tags; possibly pre-merged GS
register writes in another framing, or per-class state rather than per-primitive
draw data. Recorded as an open question rather than guessed at.

23 + 19 + 58 + 156 + 22 = 278 passing with the disc present (disc binary 35.67s),
clippy clean.
2026-10-14 04:51:43 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod bbd8cdccab Phase 5 is Aranos, not Veldin -- Veldin is not on this disc
Caught by the user, and it was wrong in four places: the Phase 5 heading, its
gate, its go/no-go line, and the PCSX2 verification plan's "Level 0 (Veldin)".

Veldin is Ratchet & Clank's home planet in the 2002 game. Going Commando opens on
Aranos, and there is no Veldin anywhere in this disc. The error looks like it
carried over from the first game when the roadmap was drafted, which is an easy
slip to make and an unhelpful one to leave standing: a vertical slice defined as
"completable and matching PCSX2 frame-for-frame" is not something anyone could
have attempted or judged while pointing at the wrong planet.

Confirmed against the vendored decomp rather than taken on faith. Its
docs/LEVELS.md refers to level 00 as Aranos directly -- "corrects three measured
Aranos entries before fingerprinting ... These corrections apply to level 00 only"
-- so level 0 is Aranos in the reference material this project has been using all
along, and the roadmap disagreed with the decomp.

There is a real R&C1 reference nearby and it is worth keeping, because the
reasoning under the gate is sound and only the noun was wrong. Phase 5 argues that
spherical gravity is the thing most likely to break, because it invalidates the
movement and camera assumptions the engine inherits from Ratchet & Clank (2002).
That is about inherited code from the previous game, not about the level being
built, and the text now says so explicitly so the next reader does not have to
work out which game is meant.

No code change. Documentation only.
2026-10-14 04:29:57 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 1fa1913e38 Reconcile the docs after the last three corrections
The last three commits changed things the documentation still asserted in the
old direction. Fixed:

roadmap
  * 227 tests -> 238.
  * The level_overlay bullet contradicted itself: it said "the header words are
    not named" in the same breath as "+0x00 load base is 0x1A7C80". Now says
    +0x00 IS the load base and is named, +0x0c is excluded as the .lit size by
    sign (below file length on 16/27, by up to 8.9%) and remains unnamed, and the
    unnamed remainder is stated as such.
  * Section names aligned with the Phase 3 list (lvl.vtbl, lvl.camvtbl,
    lvl.sndvtbl).

core-data-regions.md
  * The claim-assertion audit still said the two PCSX2 claims were "NOT
    assertable here -- needs a savestate". They are asserted now, gated on
    GC_SSTATE, in the same file. Updated, with the two corrections that fell out
    of writing them recorded right there.
  * "that string is inside the collision routine" was never established. It is
    in the string pool, yes; the reference to it is not found. Reworded to say
    so, including the zero-hit result.

research log
  * field_00 now carries its name and the .lit/$gp/program context.
  * The field_0c falsification and the byte-order retraction are both recorded
    here as well, so the log and the format file agree.

Nothing left asserting the withdrawn anchor, and no stale test counts.
2026-10-13 07:13:45 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 26a0918178 Gate the PCSX2 claims as tests; two corrections fall out of writing them
The audit two commits ago listed three claims as "not assertable here -- needs a
savestate". With PCSX2 running they are assertable, so they now are. gc-trace
already exposed gc_trace::Savestate::ee_ram_owned(); gc-extract just needed it as
a dev-dependency. Both tests are gated on GC_SSTATE and skip cleanly without it,
so a normal checkout pays nothing.

Writing them corrected two claims, which is the main reason they were worth
writing as tests rather than staying prose.

1. The collision payload is NOT "byte-for-byte identical". The original claim
   rested on a 4 KiB probe; the test compares the whole 903,248-byte payload:

     payload                903,248 bytes at RAM 0xac6800
     first difference       +0xdc82c, i.e. 903,212 bytes in
     bytes that differ      6  (0.00%)

   903,212 of 903,248 bytes are verbatim and 6 are not, all in the final 36.
   "Verbatim" was an overclaim on a probe that never looked at the tail. The test
   now measures the whole payload and reports the extent, asserting only that the
   divergence is beyond the head.

2. The tfrag relocation base is the TABLE address, not the block base. The delta is
   8,683,584 = 0x848040 = block base 0x848000 plus table_offset 0x40 -- which is
   exactly what TfragHeader::data's own documentation says, "relative to the
   table". The earlier claim said "the block's RAM base", off by exactly the table
   offset.

   Also: +0x10 and +0x38 do NOT share one constant. The aggregate "1,665 fields
   relocate by one constant" was true only because +0x10 carried it; lumping them
   hid that. The test asserts +0x10 and REPORTS +0x38's delta rather than assuming.

The patch-rewrite figures also restated on aggregate rather than median, which is
why they read lower than the 7.80%/8.12% medians recorded earlier:

  patch bytes rewritten -- cannot morph 1.9% of 334, can morph 2.1% of 499

Same conclusion, stated on a total instead of a per-patch median, and asserted to
within 3 percentage points of each other.

Net: the audit table in docs/formats/core-data-regions.md now has no "prose only"
rows for disc-or-savestate-readable claims.
2026-10-13 06:59:22 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 3ee0b3d0dc Disprove that morphing causes the tfrag byte changes: LOD selection does
Read the whole tfrags block from RAM -- 4,379,200 bytes at 0x848000 -- and compared
every one of the 833 patches against its disc copy, grouped by whether it CAN morph:

  patches with NO morphing entries   334   differing: max 10.59%, median 7.80%
  patches WITH morphing entries     499   differing: max 10.49%, median 8.12%
  patches 100% identical to disc   0/334 and 0/499

The two groups are indistinguishable. Morphing is NOT what changes the bytes, and
this disproofs the claim two commits ago that the 8.6% was "morphed positions with
topology and UVs left verbatim". If it were, the 334 patches with no morphing
entries would be untouched -- and none of them is.

Nor is it a pointer relocation: the differing bytes fall in short structured runs
(257-263, 272-277, 305 on patch 0) whose u32 deltas share no common value.

The explanation consistent with everything measured is that the loader REGENERATES
each patch's VU packet stream for the LOD tier it selected. That happens to every
patch, morphing or not -- and it is why morphing shows no signal.

This also settles the verification route, which the previous commit left as "needs
the camera distance at the savestate". It does not, and no camera distance would
help: this memory image shows the LOD-selected form rather than the morph state,
so there is nothing in it to solve a weight against. Verifying the derivation needs
a captured frame at a known view distance instead.

What is established now, all measured on the full population rather than inferred
from one patch:
  - data and cube_ofs are relocated pointers, delta 0x848000, on all 833 records
  - every patch's bytes are rewritten, ~8%, by LOD-driven packet regeneration
  - morphing is not observable in this memory image
  - 833 of 833 patches parse; 499 of 833 have morphing entries; 43,613 vertex-info
    entries across the level
2026-10-13 05:14:40 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod aff977e8c5 Correct the tfrag pointer-field claim, and show morphing regenerates VU packets
Two corrections to the previous commit, both from continuing the RAM comparison.

1. The previous commit said the RAM comparison "names two fields the disc-side
   work had left as data and an unnamed word". It does not. +0x10 is
   TfragHeader::data and +0x38 is TfragHeader::cube_ofs, both already named in the
   struct. What RAM adds is that both are POINTERS -- relocated by adding the
   block's RAM base -- rather than plain offsets. That is still worth knowing, but
   it is not a naming.

2. The previous commit attributed the 8.6% of rewritten bytes to "morphed
   positions with topology and UVs left verbatim". That is wrong, and patch 1 shows
   why. Comparing 4 KiB, disc 0xdf60 against RAM 0x855f60:

     bytes differing      354 of 4,096 = 8.6%
     contiguous runs      120
     longest run          8 bytes
     extent               +0xc1 through the end of the window

Patch 1 has 83 positions and 83 vertex-info entries, of which 13 morph. If
morphing rewrote position fields alone, the differing bytes would be a 13/83 slice
of a 498-byte position array -- a couple of dozen bytes in one contiguous region.
Instead 354 bytes differ, spread over 120 short runs across the whole window.

So the loader is not patching positions in place: it REGENERATES the VU packet
stream for the current morph state. That is what morphing is on this hardware --
VU1 GIF packets, not a CPU-side vertex array.

Consequence for verification, and the reason this is worth committing rather than
just noting: the plan of "map RAM vertices to disc indices and solve for the weight"
does not work against this memory image. The positions are inside regenerated
packets, so there is no stable per-vertex correspondence to read a weight out of.
Verifying the morph weight against the original needs the CAMERA DISTANCE at the
savestate, so the weight can be computed from the derivation and compared with the
rendered result, rather than read back out of RAM.

Population figures gathered on the way: 833 of 833 patches parse, carrying 43,613
vertex-info entries; 499 of 833 patches have at least one morphing entry, and
patch 0 -- the first record -- is base-only with none.

Also fixed a measurement error mid-run: I compared patch 1 at disc 0xdf60 against
RAM 0x855f00, off by 0x60, and got "every byte differs". The corrected base is
0x855f60.
2026-10-13 05:08:08 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 93591a79de Verify the tfrag record framing against RAM: two pointer fields, morphed vertices
The tfrags block header -- table_offset 0x40, tfrag_count 833, lod_distance 32.0
-- hits once in the level-0 savestate at RAM 0x848000, so disc offset 0 maps to
RAM 0x848000 and the block can be compared position for position.

Result 1: exactly two fields per record are rewritten. Comparing all 833 64-byte
table records field by field:

  records compared        833
  u32 fields differing    1,665 = 833 x 2, and no others
  their offsets           +0x10 and +0x38, on every record
  relocation delta        8,683,584 = 0x848000, on 833 of them

So +0x10 and +0x38 are block-relative pointers and the loader adds the block's
RAM base to each. Every other byte of all 833 records is verbatim. Six fields
differ by 0xF80000 and 0x1F00000 instead -- three records pointing into a
different buffer, recorded rather than averaged.

This names two fields the disc-side work had left as `data` and an unnamed word.

Result 2: behind the pointers, about 8.6% of bytes are rewritten. Following
record 0's +0x10 to disc 0xd040 / RAM 0x855040 and comparing 16 KiB: 14,977 bytes
identical, 1,407 differ = 8.6%. The differences spread across many field positions
rather than concentrating, which is what morphed POSITIONS look like -- topology,
UVs, counts and command lists stay verbatim while a fraction of the position bytes
move. 8.6% is about half of a 16-byte vertex's six position bytes, consistent with
roughly half the vertices in this patch mid-morph at the saved camera distance.

Not established: that the morphed bytes match resolve_vertex's formula. That needs
mapping RAM vertices to disc vertex indices and solving for the weight, which is
the next step -- but the framing is now known well enough to attempt it, and the
two pointer fields are confirmed rather than inferred.

This also answers the "is morphing real?" question that made the earlier tfrags
probe fail to match RAM: the tfrags block is not verbatim in RAM, because both its
table pointers are relocated and its vertex positions are morphed.
2026-10-13 05:04:25 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod d5e637930b Show the collision payload is verbatim in RAM, and retract the "not in RAM" claim
This overturns the premise collision work was blocked on.

Searching the level-0 savestate for a probe from collision payload +1024 hits at
0xac6c00; a probe from +64 hits at 0xac6840. The difference is 0x3C0 = 960, which
is exactly 1024 - 64, so the payload sits at a fixed relative address -- RAM
0xac6800 for the disc address 0x27e800 -- and reading it back is byte-for-byte the
disc's own bytes:

  RAM  0xac6800  0b 00 21 00 b6 08 ad 08 a4 08 6b 08 38 08 63 07
  disc 0x27e800  0b 00 21 00 b6 08 ad 08 a4 08 6b 08 38 08 63 07

Nothing is reshaped. That is the opposite of the tie block, where the loader
relocates a pointer inside each record.

The retraction. The previous note reads: "level 1's 24 x 16 grid dimensions
appear in memory, level 0's 11 x 33 appear nowhere, so disc-side decoding has to
work against the reshaped form." Level 0's dimensions ARE in RAM, at 0xac6800 --
0b 00 and 21 00 are the first two bytes of the block, 11 and 33. The search that
missed them looked for 0b 00 00 00 21 00 00 00, the dimensions as a pair of u32s.
They are stored as two u16s, so that pattern never occurs.

So the negative result was an artifact of the search pattern, not evidence about
the data -- and it was then used as a premise for several rounds of disc-side
work. Both lessons were already written down in AGENTS.md and both were re-learned:
a negative from a byte search bounds the search, not the format; and the control
here is one command -- read the predicted RAM address and compare it to the disc --
which would have shown the verbatim copy immediately.

Also recorded while mapping it: the payload contains ascending u32 offset tables
from +1024 onward, and its first two bytes are the grid dimensions, so level 0's
grid is 11 x 33.

The cell layout itself is still undecoded, but the blocker is gone: disc-side
decoding no longer has to work against a reshaped form.
2026-10-13 04:40:01 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 4e90c282ad Make the tie record relocation a command, and verify it on two levels
The relocation rule from the previous commit was established by a script that
lived in a shell history, which means the next person would have had to
rediscover it. It is now `gc-trace verify-tie-records <unpacked-dir> <level>
<class> <lod> <src>`: resolve the class, parse the block, search the RAM image
for the loaded record table, report what it found, and exit 0 only when every
record's pointer has become table + word and every field byte is verbatim.

Swept over every (class, lod) slot of two levels, from PCSX2 savestates:

  level 0: 87 slots with a block, 87 verified, 0 mismatched, 61 absent
  level 1: 104 slots with a block, 104 verified, 0 mismatched, 78 absent

So the rule holds on every LOD block of two levels the game had loaded, which
is what makes the record layout a finding rather than a reading of one block.

Writing the command also caught an off-by-one in the parser it exercises:
TieBlockHeader::records started its slice after the 16-byte header, but the
header IS the first record -- the table runs from the block start to
data_offset, and a block with data_offset 0x50 holds five records, the first
being the header itself and its pointer naming where the payload begins. Found
because the tool's first run relocated nothing while the same check in a script
had passed; the unit test fixture was wrong in the same way and is fixed.

Two operational notes now in the format doc: the live emulator is not a stable
input (verifying level 1 over PINE matched 104 of 104 while the user was on
that planet, and the same command minutes later found no matching copy because
they had returned to level 0 -- a miss there is not a counterexample, so the
report says "no copy matched" rather than "failed"), and a class index past the
table count is an error rather than a mismatch, so a sweep should stop at the
level's class count rather than a round number.
2026-10-12 15:24:48 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 2c4bbdc600 Use PCSX2 RAM to recover the chunk loader's transformation
This is what RAM was needed for: nothing about the loader's transformation is
recoverable from the disc.

Anchor: a 32-byte probe from inside a chunk record in level 0's core_data, searched
in the level-0 savestate. It hits at 0x18538a8 and the record's first bytes at
0x185387e -- exactly chunk_base + record_offset, no rescaling. So the chunk payload
is copied VERBATIM; unlike collision and the shrub packet tables it is not expanded
or repacked.

Result 1: the offset table is rewritten to absolute EE addresses.
  disc: f000057c f00006b0 f00007e4 f0000914
  RAM:  0xf185387c 0xf18539b0 0xf1853ae4 0xf1853c14
The 0xf0000000|low24 tag becomes 0xf1850000|low24 -- tag replaced by the chunk's
load base, low 24 bits untouched. Consecutive deltas agree exactly (0x134, 0x134,
0x130), which is why the disc-side stride is approximate rather than constant.

Result 2: every record gains a constant 2-byte prefix 02 00, and the rewritten
table points at THAT rather than at the record data. Walking all 90 records from
the RAM dump: prefix 02 00 on 90 of 90; the disc's index bytes preserved unchanged
at +2/+3 on 90 of 90.

Result 3, the useful one: the byte at +2 takes exactly 0, 16, 32, ... 240 -- the
16 values index_rule predicts for step = 16, phase = 0. The mixed-radix record index
derived from the disc is corroborated on the running game's own copy of the chunk.
That is a disc-derived claim validated against the game, which is the strongest form
of check available here.

On disc a chunk is [16-byte header][10 zero bytes][tagged offset table][records].
In RAM it is [16-byte header][10 zero bytes][absolute-pointer table][records each
prefixed with 02 00]. The 02 00 is unexplained -- possibly a record type or an
alignment the loader needs -- but it is constant, so like the two index bytes it
carries no per-record information.
2026-10-12 04:32:07 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod d8b8ccc6d4 Follow the gameplay.bin pointers: they address position and direction arrays
Where the pointers go. Following them shows what gameplay.bin indexes. The leading
table is 39 words, all of which land inside the file, and three clusters
dominate: near 150000, near 800000 and near 1050000.

The region near 797808 is position data -- 31 consecutive plausible floats that
group cleanly into xyz triples:

  246.948 201.015  73.867 |  88.240 186.000 302.598 | 107.712  12.723 183.125
  353.591 126.365  19.962 | 182.068 374.001 122.567 | 116.961 265.001 437.866

and the region near 797456 is direction data -- unit-length vectors:

  0.969 0.945 0.733 | -0.120 0.433 0.250 | -0.866 0.000 0.267

So the file's leading words are a table of pointers into float arrays, not a flat
list of small integers. The earlier reading of it as "u32 pointers holding
nothing" was too quick: it is a pointer table into data that is present.

Volumes remain unlocated. The position arrays are the right shape to bound a
volume and nothing yet shows the volume records themselves.
2026-10-12 03:36:55 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod b17ec17127 Rule out the moby_anim instance-table reading of the chunk types
moby_anim was the one post-shrub chunk type with a concrete reason to exist: an
instance table would have to scale with the level's moby class count, so
comparing per-type record counts against that count was the obvious test.

It fails, and the way it fails is itself the result: per-type record counts are
level-independent. The same types report the same counts on every level tried:

  type_id     level0  level1  level2  level3
  0x007d7ec438   90      90      90      90
  0x00d3d8c4a9   90      90      90      90
  0x00429ec43d   77      77      77      77
  0x0053c8c4aa   77      77      77      77
  0x007626c4a4   50      50      50      50
  0x00fb88c462   47      47      47      47

Across all 27 levels there are 77 distinct chunk types, the largest at 2430
records total -- exactly 90 x 27.

What that rules out: nothing in this chunk set is a per-moby-class instance table,
because those counts would vary by level the way the moby class counts do. So
whatever holds moby animation data is either keyed by something other than the
class count, or it is not among these chunk types.

Also visible: the types pair up. 0x007d7ec438 and 0x00d3d8c4a9 both report 90 on
every level; 0x00429ec43d and 0x0053c8c4aa both report 77. Two chunk types
carrying identical, constant record counts on every level is a signature of two
views of the same fixed table rather than two independent tables that happen to
agree.

Still open: the pairings are described but not explained, and no type has been
named. The Moby class-ID enrichment from earlier stands separately -- 9493 hits
against 246.1 expected is real, and the class arrays are contiguous per type, but
that identifies where classes are referenced, not which chunk is moby_anim.
2026-10-12 03:33:52 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 02ced5ee83 Parse the per-level overlay: header, constant block, level data
level_overlay was the least-characterised file in the level set -- no parser, no
located structure. It now has gc_formats::overlay and a real-disc test over all 27
levels:

  overlay: 27 levels; field_00 1735808, field_08 1;
  field_04 37540..=45308, field_0c 2763912..=3027336
  (17 below the file length, 10 above);
  +0x10..0x1220 identical on all

The header is four words. +0x0c is not the file length: it was recorded as one on
the strength of the first levels measured, where it sat near the file end, but
across all 27 it falls on both sides -- below on 17, above on 10 -- so it is an
ordinary level-specific word. The test asserts this, being the claim most worth
pinning.

The common prefix is 4 bytes, not the whole header: +0x00 is constant at 1735808
while +0x04 and +0x0c vary. Everything from +0x10 to +0x1220 -- 4624 bytes -- is
byte-identical on all 27 levels.

Still not named: what any of the four header words means, and how the
level-specific tail is structured. The module reports them as fields.

Also records in docs/plan/pcsx2-verification.md that the 64-byte RAM stride from
the previous commit is disproved. A 415 KB dump of level 1 finds the longest such
run at 27 records, not 384, and those are identity matrices -- 27 of them, one per
level. It is a per-level transform table, not the collision grid, and the 20.0
reported there was a coincidence.
2026-10-12 03:32:02 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod bd012efe71 Find a 64-byte collision record stride in RAM, and record a savestate search pitfall
Searching the savestates for the collision grid dimensions as a u32 pair -- level
0's 11 x 33 and level 1's 24 x 16 -- puts level 1's at several RAM addresses and
level 0's nowhere. So the grid dimensions are not held in RAM as adjacent u32s,
and the collision payload is reshaped on load, as the shrub packet tables are.

A nearby region of level 1's RAM does show structure. At 0x12e048c and
0x12e04cc, 64 bytes apart:

  28 01 00 00 | 92 ff 00 00 | 04 00 a0 41 | ...
     296        -110        20.0f

Searching for that shared 12-byte tag finds a consecutive run at a 64-byte
stride in slot 2:

  0x12df390
  0x12df3d0   +0x40
  0x12df410   +0x40

plus scattered singles elsewhere. Slot 1 has the tag at four addresses not on a
64-byte stride, so the two levels lay it out differently.

What this is: a 64-byte record carrying two small signed values and a float
reading exactly 20.0 -- the shape of a per-cell entry with coordinates and a
radius or half-extent, which is what the collision grid would hold.

What this is not: it is not decoded. Three consecutive records is not enough to
establish a stride, the tag matches only a few records rather than a whole grid,
and 20.0 may be coincidence. Level 1's grid is 384 cells; nothing here has been
shown to count to 384.

Method note: savestates are compressed on disk, so a byte scan of the file finds
nothing. All RAM search must go through gc-trace find --state, which decompresses
first -- scanning the file directly reports zero hits for a sequence that
demonstrably exists in memory.
2026-10-12 03:27:14 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod d3e1475f64 Characterise gameplay.bin as a flat pointer table, and record volumes as unlocated
Range measured: the first 40 u32 and the whole file, on levels 0 and 1 --
1872256 and 2006400 bytes.

Result: the file is a flat array of u32, opening with a small count then a run of
ascending offsets, terminating on a zero:

  level 0  336 797472 798832 799136  464 150672 150688 314800 479920 ...
           ... 1847600 1845456 797808 1829056 160 1849088 1249808 1847616 0

  level 1  496 799904 800128 800432  624 151152 151168 315680 481456 ...
           ... 1984496 1982400 800112 1966000 160 1988160 1303456 1984512 0

Both levels carry the same shape. The sentinel 160 appears at u32 index 34 on
both and the zero terminator at index 38 on both, with counts 336 against 496
and 464 against 624 at the head. The leading ~38 words are a structured header
whose layout is level-independent apart from its sizes.

The offsets cluster into groups -- near 800000, 150000, 1050000, 1800000 --
which is what a table of pointers into several buffers looks like.

Not decoded: what the pointers point into, what 160 is, and why the zero
terminator sits at the same index on both levels. No gc_formats module exists for
this yet; it is characterised, not parsed.

On volumes: nothing resembling volumes was found here. gameplay.bin is u32
pointers throughout and holds no float data in its first 64 words read as f32 --
59 of 64 are denormals, i.e. small integers reinterpreted. Volumes remain
unlocated on the disc; nothing in the regions examined so far presents itself as
one.
2026-10-12 03:19:03 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 575d1a5bdd Correct the overlay strings from a table to a pool
The previous commit described a "debug string table on 16-byte alignment". It is
not a table. Dumping the 32 bytes before each run shows most are the tail of the
previous string:

  +3104  "host0:r:/rc2/shock/wavetable.bin"   32 chars
  +3120  "ck/wavetable.bin"                   its own tail
  +3152  "/i5/shock/wavetable1.bin"
  +3168  "ble1.bin"                           its own tail

and the 32-byte prefixes are 327 distinct out of 332 -- essentially all different,
because they are just the preceding string's bytes. There is no per-record header
here. It is one contiguous pool of debug text, and the 16-byte alignment is a
property of how the pool was laid out, which makes continuations land on
boundaries and read as separate entries.

The count of 332 "strings" was therefore inflated by the same effect: it counts
continuations as entries.

The substance is unchanged and still useful -- the pool carries the game's own
debug text, including "Camera_CollPrimTest WARNING! - grid out of bounds! (RAR)",
which is direct evidence for reading the collision payload's two leading u16 as
grid dimensions, and the wavetable.bin paths, which bear on the sound bank
framing. Only the framing was wrong.

The pool is located and counted but not parsed, and there is no gc_formats module
for it. The +0x18/+0x20 names are section names but their structure is not
established, and it is not shown that they index anything.
2026-10-12 03:17:50 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod a5a33b9bc0 Locate level_overlay's sections and a 16-aligned debug string table
level_overlay was on the open list with no parser and no located structure. It
now has a header naming two sections and a string table.

Range measured: overlay.bin on levels 0, 1 and 2 -- 2751268, 2763668 and
2928424 bytes.

Result 1: the file opens with section names.

  +000: 80 7c 1a 00 | dc 99 00 00 | 01 00 00 00 | 88 3b 2a 00
  +010: 00 00 00 00 | 00 00 00 00 | "crap\n"     | 00 00 00 00 00
  +020: "system misc" 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  +030: 20 80 ff 40 | 00 60 cf 00 | 64 00 | 46 00 | 19 00 00 00

u32@+0x00 is 1735808 on all three levels, +0x08 is 1, and the bytes at +0x18 and
+0x20 spell "crap" and "system misc".

Result 2: a debug string table on 16-byte alignment. 332 such strings on level
0, 362 on level 1, 351 on level 2, first at +0x20 and last between 1.3 MB and
2.5 MB. They are the game's own debug text:

  host0:r:/rc2/shock/wavetable.bin
  host0:z:/i5/shock/wavetable1.bin
  unloaded sound bank %#010x
  Camera_CollPrimTest WARNING! - grid out of bounds! (RAR)
  render setup
  sky draw
  pre effects
  pre 2 effects

Camera_CollPrimTest WARNING! - grid out of bounds! (RAR) is direct evidence for
the collision reading. It is the game's own string, naming a grid and a
collision test, and it is why the two leading counts in the collision payload are
worth continuing to treat as grid dimensions despite not sizing the payload.

The wavetable.bin paths also confirm the sound bank is loaded from named files,
which bears on the SBlk/DAW framing.

Not done: the string table is located and counted but not parsed -- the records
preceding each string have not been identified, so there is no gc_formats module
for it yet. The +0x18/+0x20 names are section names but their structure is not
established, and it is not yet shown that they index anything.
2026-10-12 03:11:25 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod e58ab0e815 Correct the collision table's extent: 17 entries, deltas rise then fall
+5932 is the table's start, not a point inside it: walking backwards, no
predecessor satisfies "ascending with a delta under 4096". The run is 17 entries,
not 19 -- the earlier 19 counted two entries past the jump.

The deltas are

  204 212 216 224 224 228 228 228 224 220 216 200 96 96 100 96

then a jump of 41484 to 190508. The deltas rise and then fall -- a symmetric
profile, not a monotone one. That weakens the prefix-sum reading: a cumulative
offset table has no reason to come back down, whereas cell contents that grow and
shrink as the table walks across a level would.

17 against a 75-cell grid, and 75 - 17 = 58. No arithmetic relating the two has
been found. The earlier guess that 19 related to 3x25 did not survive
re-measurement and is not carried forward.

Still open. 17 entries may not correspond to the grid at all -- the table may
cover something else, or a subset of cells. Resolving it needs either the same
offset found in other levels at a position the leading counts predict, or a
reason for 17. Neither exists yet, and this is where the measurement trail goes
cold on collision.
2026-10-12 03:08:03 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod b66e77855c Locate a per-cell offset table in collision, on level 4
Range measured: longest strictly-ascending u32 run (delta under 65536) in each
level's collision payload, levels 0 to 5.

Level 4 is the clean case. Grid 3x25, payload 2660608, and at payload +5932 a
run of 19 entries whose values are all inside the payload, starting at 146012:

  deltas 204, 212, 216, 224, 224, 228, 228

The deltas grow monotonically, which is the signature of a prefix sum over
records of increasing size -- what a per-cell offset table looks like when cell
contents vary.

The others are not:

  level 0  11x33   +21232   17   8193, 24575, 8192, 8192   multiples of 8192,
                                                              coincidental on
                                                              dense data
  level 1  24x16   +41452   29   32771, 57339, 24575        wild, no trend
  level 2   1x53   +13752   49   24, 64, 396, 104          in-region but
                                                              irregular
  level 3  19x31  +667152   18   769, 257, 257, 257        values ~5.2e8, far
                                                              outside the payload
  level 4   3x25    +5932   19   204, 212, 216, 224        growing, in-region

Only level 4's run has both properties a prefix sum needs: values inside the
payload, and deltas that grow.

What this does not give: level 4's run is 19 entries against 75 grid cells, so
it is not one offset per cell -- either most cells share an offset, are empty,
or the table covers something other than the grid. Nothing measured picks between
those.

Next to check: whether 19 relates to 3x25 by any arithmetic, and whether the
same offset at +5932 exists in other levels at a position given by their leading
counts. Neither has been tried.
2026-10-12 03:03:18 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 2569cc06ab Decode the collision payload's leading two counts
Range measured: the first four bytes of the payload on all 19 levels that carry
a non-empty one.

Result: two u16 at payload +0 and +2, both non-zero on all 19, ranging 1..74 and
13..112, products 53 to 3256.

  level  0  11 x 33  =   363   payload   903248
  level  1  24 x 16  =   384   payload  2800496
  level  2   1 x 53  =    53   payload  2315296
  level  7  40 x 35  =  1400   payload  4049232
  level  9  74 x 44  =  3256   payload  2518352
  level 13   2 x 64  =   128   payload  3333520
  level 26  27 x 112 =  3024   payload   652176

Reported as two counts, not as a named grid. They have the shape of collision
grid dimensions -- bounded, both non-zero, products in the hundreds to thousands
-- but nothing measured ties the product to the payload size or to any per-cell
stride. Level 2's 1 x 53 giving a 2.3 MB payload and level 26's 27 x 112 giving
652 KB shows the product does not size the payload, so either cells vary wildly
in size or these are not grid dimensions. Naming them width and depth would be a
reading, not a measurement.

After the two counts comes a run of u16 that stays below 8192 for 30 to 58
entries depending on level, always an even count, and is not ascending. That is
where the per-cell table most likely starts, and it is the next thing to
resolve.

Exposed as CollisionHeader::first and ::second. They live in the payload rather
than the header, so CollisionHeader::region fills them in and the bare
CollisionHeader::parse leaves them zero -- documented at the call site so the
difference is not mistaken for an absence.
2026-10-12 02:58:46 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 72bbd5da38 Rule out GS packet framing in tie, with a control that nearly fooled me
Range measured: level 0, the 73 tie span bodies (bytes +0x40 onward), 2585856
bytes pooled. Per-position distinct counts, an autocorrelation scan against a
shuffled control, and a GS GIF tag test.

Result 1: the bodies are dense. Every one of the 16 slot positions takes 245 to
256 distinct values, byte 15 zero on 81.3% and byte 7 zero on 78.8%. The best
stride peak is 48 at +0.097, barely above 16 at +0.095 -- no period.

Result 2: no GS GIF framing at 16-byte alignment. Testing whether byte 15's low
three bits fall in 0..4, the GS tag range, gives 97.0%.

That looked like a strong hit until the control was done properly. A uniform
shuffle gives 62.6%, exactly 5/8, what a random byte predicts -- so the naive
comparison reads as a 34-point excess.

The distribution-matched null is 97.0%, identical to the observation. The whole
excess was that byte 15 is 81% zero and (0 & 7) <= 4 is always true. Recomputed
per alignment the null tracks the observation everywhere:

  align 0  97.0%    align 4  75.7%    align 8  96.7%
  align 2  75.5%    align 12 89.3%

This is the control rule earning its place a second time. A uniform shuffle is
not a matched control when the data is skewed, and AGENTS.md already says so;
the near-miss was reading 62.6% as a baseline without checking what the data's
own distribution predicts. The tie bytes concentrate on 0, 1, 2, 3 and 63 --
suggestive in isolation -- and still carry no framing.

What this rules out: the tie bodies are not GS GIF packet streams at 16-byte
alignment and carry no measurable periodicity. With every slot position taking
~256 distinct values they are dense data -- fat vertices, as the roadmap expects
-- and locating the vertex layout needs a reference for this game's instanced
geometry format, not another stride scan.
2026-10-12 02:56:58 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 86ff2e6052 Measure tie spans: a constant first word and three quantized floats
Range measured: all 1864 tie spans across 27 levels, read at each class entry's
geometry offset.

Method: read +0x00, +0x0c and the three f32 at +0x10, +0x14, +0x18, and count
distinct values per position.

Result:

  u32@+0x00 takes exactly one value across all 1864 spans: 0x00000100, 256
  +0x0c takes 83 distinct values, so it is not constant
  the three floats take 103 distinct triples built from 42 distinct values,
    and those values are round -- 4, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 25, 30
    with only 10 of the 42 exact powers of two

Two level 0 spans open:

  +000  00000100 00005070 000065c0 07050612
  +010  41400000 41c80000 42200000 00009460

  +000  00000100 00007ca0 0000a040 0605091e
  +010  41400000 41c80000 42200000 0000ddf0

This rules out the bounding-box reading. A box would take continuous values;
these come from a 42-value set of round numbers, so they are authored or
quantised quantities -- a grid, a size class, or LOD thresholds -- and nothing
measured separates those.

Correction: these floats were previously read as a bounding-box minimum, from
level 0's first two spans happening to share (12.0, 25.0, 40.0). That triple
holds on 266 of 1864 spans, not all of them, and the value set is quantised.

Not decoded: what the three floats are, what 0x100 at +0x00 counts, and what
the 83 values at +0x0c are.
2026-10-12 02:52:45 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 32a24574be Identify data.bin as the level file descriptor, not geometry
data.bin is the largest per-level file -- 13.3 MB on level 0, 4.2 to 21.9 MB
across the disc -- and had been characterised only as "4-byte structured".

Range measured: the first 64 u32 of data.bin on levels 0, 1, 2 and 5, compared
against the actual byte lengths of the other extracted level files.

Method: read the first 64 u32 and look for any equal to the size of
core_index.bin, gs_ram.bin, overlay.bin, gameplay.bin, sound_bank.bin or
core_data.bin.

Result: three exact matches, at the same indices on every level.

  u32 index 1  overlay.bin     2751268  2763668  2928424  2863676
  u32 index 3  core_index.bin    31600    34016    33808    23536
  u32 index 5  gs_ram.bin       518656   569344   513024   434176

Each is the exact byte length of the named file and each lands on the same index
on all four levels. Three coincidences at fixed positions is not a coincidence.

So data.bin is a descriptor for the level's other files, not geometry in its own
right. The roadmap's "the large one: 4.2 to 21.9 MB of geometry per level" entry
was wrong and is corrected.

The intervening indices 0, 2 and 4 hold values that are not file sizes and their
meaning is not established; they are plausibly offsets, but no cumulative-sum or
offset+size relation has been checked yet.

What follows the descriptor is still unknown, and the file is large enough that
the descriptor is unlikely to be all of it.
2026-10-12 02:50:24 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 5610d173b0 Narrow the collision header to two fields plus a third used by five levels
Range measured: all 27 levels that carry collision, reading the 0x40-byte
header each.

Method: read +0x00, +0x04 and +0x08, then check +0x08..+0x40 for zero.

Result:

  u32@+0x00 is 0x40 on 27 of 27 -- the header is self-sizing
  u32@+0x04 is the payload size, 20 distinct values across the disc
  bytes +0x08..+0x40 zero on 22 of 27

Five levels carry a large non-zero word at +0x08:

  level  7  1248048        level 12  2541616
  level  9  1766832        level 13  3376592
                      level 14  4060640

So the header is not two fields and 56 bytes of padding: there is a third field
most levels leave at zero and five use. Whether it is a size, an offset or a
second block's length is not established, and nothing measured here separates
those readings. Exposed as CollisionHeader::field_08.

Correction: the collision header was previously described as self-describing
across its full 0x40, which is true for 22 levels and overstates the case for
the other five.

Still not decoded: the payload. It contains ascending u32 runs on levels 0 and
2 -- level 0 at +280 with deltas 12, 12, 12 then a jump, level 2 at +13868 with
deltas 204, 204, 200, 196 -- but irregular deltas fit neither a flat table nor a
simple stride, and level 1's apparent run is a byte-shift false positive.
Nothing about the payload is asserted.
2026-10-12 02:49:25 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 681e7e62ef Parse the sky block: 149 sub-objects with a bounding sphere, and correct the count field
Range measured: all 27 levels, each sky region from the core index's sky offset
to the next region.

Method: read the 32-bit offset table at +0x20, bounded by staying inside the
region, and parse each sub-object it names.

Result: 149 sub-objects across 27 levels. Each opens with a count, then a
bounding sphere of four floats at +0x10, then a texture offset at +0x20 and
dimensions at +0x24/+0x26:

  +000: 26 00 00 00 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  +010: e0 8d b2 c1 | 9f d6 f6 3d | ef fc fb be | 1c 61 4e 41
  +020: 90 99 05 00 | 1d 00 | 1d 00 | 00 00 e8 00 ...

Count 1 to 38, width 3 to 81, radius 1.95 to 14.56, and the radius is positive
on 149 of 149 -- the same sphere shape and the same reasoning as the shrub class
header's.

Correction to an earlier claim: the word at +0x0c is not the sub-object count. It
reads 5 on level 0 where the table holds 6 entries, 3 on level 1 against 4, 7 on
level 3 against 8, and 196617 on level 2 against 4. Across the disc
offsets.len() == count+1 holds on 10 of 27 levels.

The field is reported as SkyHeader::field_0c and nothing depends on it; the
offset table enumerates the sub-objects and is self-limiting. That earlier claim
came from level 0 alone, where 5 against 6 looked like a consistent off-by-one.
It is not an off-by-one -- it is a field that happens to be small on most levels
and is not a count at all.

gc_formats::sky parses the header and the sub-objects. The gated test asserts the
sphere is finite, the radius positive where positive at all, the dimensions
non-zero, and the sub-object list non-empty on every level.
2026-10-12 02:43:28 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod bbce492c91 Establish that the loader produces the RAM packet forms, not the disc
Everything previously reported about five-block sub-lists and fixed-point
payloads was read out of the running game. Checking the same packets on disc
settles what the disc actually stores.

Range measured: level 0, all 29 packets named by the +0x40 tables of the 6
bounded spans, read at their span-relative offsets; 1636 whole 16-byte records
after the 16-byte header.

Neither RAM form exists on disc:

                     disc              RAM
  00 00 00 30 per    exactly 1         exactly 5
  sub-list packet
  blocks at 0/32/64  0 of 10           11 of 11
  fixed-point byte3  0 of 19           100%
  == 0x80

The 29 packets split 10 sub-list / 19 fixed-point by whether they contain
00 00 00 30 at all, and not one of the ten has the block structure, and not one
of the nineteen has the fixed-point marker.

The disc body is a compact 16-byte record stream:

  +000: 04 04 00 01 | 00 00 00 00 | 00 00 00 05 | 00 80 0e 6c
  +010: 02 00 00 00 | 05 00 00 00 | 32 00 00 00 | 0e 00 00 00
  +020: 09 00 00 00 | 00 40 3e 30 | 12 04 00 00 | 05 00 00 00
  +030: 09 00 00 00 | 00 40 3e 30 | 12 04 00 00 | 21 00 00 00

Small u32 fields and a repeating 00 40 3e 30 12 04 00 00. Per position over all
1636 records the same two outliers hold: byte 7 takes 4 distinct values and byte
15 takes 2, against 101 to 153 everywhere else.

Byte 7 is per-record, not per-packet: the first record of all 29 packets has
byte 7 = 0x00. The four-value vocabulary varies within a packet body rather than
tagging the packet, which is why grouping packets by it never separated the two
kinds.

Consequence for Phase 2: the payload is encoded on disc and expanded at load, so
a disc parser can bound it and check its signature but cannot read it as either
RAM form. Decoding it means reversing the expansion, not re-describing what the
loader produced. That is the honest boundary of what is known.
2026-10-12 02:37:55 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 5ade83cf0a Parse the shrub packet header, a fixed signature on all 2056 disc packets
The packets found by the +0x40 table have a header the whole disc agrees on.

Range measured: every packet on the disc -- 2056 of them, across the 334
successor-bounded spans -- read at each packet's span-relative offset.

  bytes 0-3   04 04 00 01   2056 / 2056
  bytes 4-7   zero           2056 / 2056
  byte  8     zero           2056 / 2056
  byte  11    0x05           2056 / 2056
  size % 16   zero           2056 / 2056

Zero exceptions on any of the five.

And the loader fills the rest in. Read back out of the running game the same
records carry byte 8 as a count (0x0b to 0x29 observed), byte 11 as one of four
tag values, and bytes 12-15 as an absolute EE RAM pointer where the disc has a
span-relative offset. Bytes 8-15 are rewritten wholesale on load.

That settles what the disc header is for. It carries no count of its own, and
the count the RAM copy has is the +0x40 table's count arriving by another
route. The disc header is a signature; the RAM header is populated state.

ShrubPacketHeader::parse and Shrub::packet_headers() expose this. parse returns
None unless all the invariants hold, rather than a default, so a packet that
does not match is reported as not-understood instead of half-interpreted.

The gated test asserts all four header invariants and the size alignment on
every packet of every bounded span.

This is the first piece of the mesh packet format represented in gc-formats;
everything known about the packet payloads so far is RAM measurement, since the
disc form of bytes 8-15 is rewritten at load.
2026-10-12 02:35:00 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod af0b1aa949 Repeat the packet measurements per level, correcting two over-general claims
The five-block result was measured on level 0 only. Rule 3a asks for the same
measurement per partition, so it was repeated on level 1's savestate before
being written up as a property.

Range measured: savestate slot 2 (level 1), RAM 0x22a000..0x28f52f, 415024
bytes, then six of its pointer-bearing records read to count*16.

The six sampled pointers split 3/3 between the two payload kinds:

  00949430  41  00 00 00 30  sub-list
  009496c0  13  69 b0 bf 80  fixed-point
  00957970  36  00 00 00 30  sub-list
  00957bb0  10  58 7e 8d 80  fixed-point
  0095b740  12  37 49 41 80  fixed-point
  0095d6d0  57  00 00 00 30  sub-list

Taking all six as sub-list gives 3/6 with five blocks. Taking only the three
that actually open 00 00 00 30 gives 3/3, with the first three blocks at 0, 32,
64 in all three. The three fixed-point payloads have zero such blocks, as
expected. The earlier 3/6 was my sampling, not a counterexample -- the six
pointers were never all the same kind of object.

Combined: 11 of 11 sub-list payloads across both levels have exactly five
blocks, the first three at offsets 0, 32, 64.

The fixed-point payloads have an exact signature: byte 3 of every 4-byte group
is 0x80 in 100% of cases -- 52/52, 40/40, 48/48 over the first 512 bytes of the
three level 1 samples, and the same across all nine level 0 payloads. That
separates the two payload kinds without the record tag, which does not select
them.

Correction: level 1's record tags are not level 0's. The same scan finds 18
04 04 00 01 headers against 19, plus 6 02 01 00 01 against 10, and byte 11 is
no longer constant: 0x30 on 10, 0x00 on 5, 0x20 on 2, 0xbc on 1, where level 0
had 0x30 on all 19. "Byte 11 is 0x30, constant" was a level-0 partition result
written up as universal; across both levels it takes four values.

Fixed-point payload entropy over all nine level 0 payloads is 5.51 to 5.89 bits
per byte against 8.0 for uniform, and the mean of the s16 reading varies per
payload from -82 to -907 -- structured, and consistent with vertex positions
relative to a per-payload origin.

Not established: what the five blocks are, and how the fixed-point data decodes
to vertices. Its entropy is far below random, so it is compressed or permuted
rather than stored plainly, and the permutation table seen once in 0x009376f0
remains unexplained.
2026-10-12 02:31:27 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 186a700f32 Establish the sub-list payload as a fixed five-block shape
All eight sub-list payloads from level 0 were read to their exact extent
(count * 16) and compared block by block.

Range measured: savestate slot 1, the packets at 0x009376f0, 0x00939c50,
0x0093cc70, 0x00998880, 0x009c19c0, 0x009cf370, 0x009d2da0 and 0x009f5aa0,
counts 21 to 41, each truncated to exactly count*16 bytes.

Every payload contains exactly five blocks tagged 00 00 00 30, and the first
three are always at offsets 0, 32 and 64:

  009376f0  22  0, 32, 64, 184, 304
  00939c50  36  0, 32, 64, 268, 400
  0093cc70  23  0, 32, 64, 200, 288
  00998880  36  0, 32, 64, 272, 404
  009c19c0  25  0, 32, 64, 196, 300
  009cf370  24  0, 32, 64, 204, 316
  009d2da0  41  0, 32, 64, 308, 448
  009f5aa0  21  0, 32, 64, 176, 280

Blocks 4 and 5 move with the payload; the first three do not. Eight payloads,
eight different block-4/5 positions, and 0/32/64 in every case.

Per-block fields constant across all eight:

  block 0  byte 4 varies 0x78..0xcd
  block 1  byte 4 = 0 in 8/8, trailer 00000000 in 8/8
  block 2  byte 4 varies independently, bytes 16-20 zero in 8/8
  block 3  byte 4 EQUALS BLOCK 0 in 8/8
  block 4  byte 4 = 0 in 8/8

Block 2's word is unrelated to block 0's in every case, so the equality is not
every block reading one shared field.

Correction: the "byte permutation table" reported in the previous commit does
not generalise. It appears in 0x009376f0 at offset 212, but a scan across all
eight payloads finds no such run outside that one. It was one payload's block
content, not a format feature. The five-block shape, the fixed 0/32/64 offsets
and the block-0/block-3 equality are what survive eight-way comparison.

Not established: what the five blocks are, why blocks 0 and 3 share a word, and
what moves blocks 4 and 5 -- their offsets are not monotone in count (21 gives
280, 36 gives 400 and 404), so something inside the earlier blocks sets them.
2026-10-12 02:30:06 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 3fa64b7003 Read a full sub-list payload: tagged blocks and a byte permutation table
With the extent known from the previous entry (count * 16), a whole sub-list
payload can be read. This is the packet at 0x009376f0, count 22, 352 bytes.

Range measured: savestate slot 1, 0x009376f0..0x0093784f.

The payload is a sequence of blocks, each opening 00 00 00 30, carrying a
repeating word and a short trailer:

  00 00 00 30 | cd 00 00 00 cd 00 00 00 cd 00 00 00 cd 00 00 00
              01 00 00 05 | 22 c1 01 6e | 00 00 00 00
  00 00 00 30 | 00 00 00 45 00 00 00 45 1d 00 00 00 1d 00 00 00 1f
              81 01 6d 00 | 00 00 00 00 | 00 00 a4 00
  00 00 00 30 | bc c0 03 00 23 17 03 00 e5 dd 00 00 00 00 00 00
              02 01 00 01 | c1 80 01 69 | 00 00 00 00

The repeating word differs per block (0xcd, 0x45, 0x03) and the trailer's
second word varies in its high bytes (22 c1 01 6e, 81 01 6d 00, c1 80 01 69).
Every block ends 6e, 69 or 6d at byte 23 -- the same 6e the 02 01 00 01 records
carried at bytes 8-9.

The payload contains a byte permutation table at 0x009377c4:

  00 01 02 03 3e 3f 53 54 40 41 42 43 4e 4f 50 51 04 05 06 07 08 ...

Ascending byte values with a handful (3e 3f, 53 54, 40 41 42 43, 4e 4f 50 51)
lifted out of order ahead of the sequential run. Read as a table it maps each
of 0x00..0x39 to a slot -- the shape of a code-length or symbol-ordering table,
and the first thing in this format that is self-evidently a table rather than
data to be interpreted.

Not said: whether it is a Huffman-style code, an index reorder for the vertex
data that follows, or a palette permutation. The sequence continues to 39 then
23 c1 01 6e, after which the next block opens.

Corroboration: the fixed-point payload 0x00937850 begins exactly where this one
ends. The 22-record identity made the boundary exact and the next packet starts
on a payload boundary with nothing in between, so the two payload kinds sit
adjacent in RAM -- consistent with them being two records of the same blob.
2026-10-12 02:28:07 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod f1cf6cd164 Show the byte-8 count sizes sub-list payloads at exactly 16 bytes each
The previous entry left one test: compare the count at byte 8 against the
payload extent. Pointer spacing gives the extent, since the packets lie in
ascending order in EE RAM.

Range measured: savestate slot 1, the 17 packets in RAM 0x22a000..0x24037f,
each with its record address, byte-8 count and pointer, sorted by pointer.

Result: eight packets sit exactly count*16 bytes after their predecessor -- a
ratio of 16.00 in every one, no rounding.

  0x22a6e8  count 22  ptr 009376f0  gap 352   16.00
  0x22a728  count 36  ptr 00939c50  gap 576   16.00
  0x22a768  count 23  ptr 0093cc70  gap 368   16.00
  0x22a7a8  count 36  ptr 00998880  gap 576   16.00
  0x22a7e8  count 25  ptr 009c19c0  gap 400   16.00
  0x22a828  count 24  ptr 009cf370  gap 384   16.00
  0x22a868  count 41  ptr 009d2da0  gap 656   16.00
  0x22a8a8  count 21  ptr 009f5aa0  gap 336   16.00

Eight exact hits at a ratio that must be an integer is not luck. The count at
byte 8 is the record count, and these payloads are 16 bytes per record.

These are exactly the sub-list payloads -- 009376f0, 00939c50, 0093cc70,
00998880 and 009d2da0 were read directly in earlier passes and all open
00 00 00 30 followed by a repeated word.

The other nine have ratios of 168, 419, 559, 31288, 7985, 3458, 764 and 6452
-- no shared factor, far too large to be a record count times anything. Either
their payload is not followed immediately by the next packet in pointer order,
or they are not 16 bytes per record. Ruled out either way: they do not follow
the same rule.

This resolves byte 8, measured two entries ago as "a count, 0x0b to 0x29" and
now shown to size a payload exactly in eight independent cases within one
level. Whether it also sizes the fixed-point payloads is the open half.

Still open: why the fixed-point packets differ, and what the 16 bytes per
sub-list record are -- the repeated word (0xcd, 0xc0, 0xc8, 0x78) differs per
packet, so the records are not identical to each other.
2026-10-12 02:27:28 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod db76319600 Find a second packet record magic interleaved with the first
Range measured: savestate slot 1, RAM 0x22a000..0x24037f.

Result: a second four-byte record magic appears at comparable density beside
04 04 00 01 -- 02 01 00 01, ten occurrences against nineteen. The two interleave:
every 02 01 00 01 sits between two 04 04 00 01 records.

  0x22a6b8  04 04 00 01  13 00 00 30  70 6a 93 00
  0x22a6c8  02 01 00 01  19 c0 4c 6e  00 00 10 00  00 00 00 00
  0x22a6e8  04 04 00 01  16 00 00 30  f0 76 93 00
  0x22a6f8  04 04 00 01  16 00 00 30  50 78 93 00
  0x22a708  02 01 00 01  1e c0 58 6e  00 00 10 00  00 00 00 00
  0x22a728  04 04 00 01  24 00 00 30  50 9c 93 00

The 02 01 00 01 records are 16 bytes like the others but carry no pointer --
bytes 12-15 are zero in all ten. Their fields are a count at 4-5 (0x14, 0x19,
0x1e), a constant 0xc0 at 6, a varying byte at 7 (0x30, 0x4c, 0x54, 0x58),
0x6e at 8-9, and 10 00 at 10-11.

The 0x6e at bytes 8-9 matches the ".. c1 01 6e" the sub-list payloads carry at
offset 20-23. That is a second correspondence, and unlike the one retracted in
the previous commit it is a shared value rather than a shared position.

Not settled: this still does not say what discriminates the two payload kinds
among the 04 04 00 01 records, since those share the same magic and the same
0x30 at byte 11 and differ only in the count at byte 8. The 02 01 00 01 records
sit between them rather than replacing them, so they are a companion structure
rather than the missing discriminator.

Next: compare the count at byte 8 against the payload's own length.
2026-10-12 02:24:22 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 2d7de9f13e Correct the packet tag mapping: the tag does not select the payload
The previous commit mapped the disc tag vocabulary onto the three payload
classes. A wider scan says that is wrong.

Range measured: savestate slot 1, RAM 0x22a000..0x24037f -- 91008 bytes, 20
times the span scanned before.

Result: 19 packet headers, and all 19 carry byte 11 = 0x30. There are no 0x6d
or 0x80 tags anywhere in this range. Reading six payloads:

  rec 0022a6b8 tag 30 -> 8d 8c 80 80 89 87 7c 80 ...   fixed point
  rec 0022a6e8 tag 30 -> 00 00 00 30 cd 00 00 00 ...   sub-list
  rec 0022a6f8 tag 30 -> 92 90 84 80 94 94 86 80 ...   fixed point
  rec 0022a728 tag 30 -> 00 00 00 30 c0 00 00 00 ...   sub-list
  rec 0022a738 tag 30 -> 4c 4c 4b 80 4c 4c 4b 80 ...   fixed point
  rec 0022a768 tag 30 -> 00 00 00 30 78 00 00 00 ...   sub-list

Records of identical tag alternate between two payload kinds. The tag does not
select the payload.

What went wrong: the previous entry took the 0x30 and 0x6d that head the
payloads to be the disc-side tag vocabulary, and matched them to payload classes
by that correspondence. The disc vocabulary at record byte 7 (0x00, 0x30, 0x6d,
0x80) and RAM record byte 11 are different fields that merely overlap in two
values. Three payloads each made the coincidence look like a rule.

What is actually established about the RAM header:

  0-3    04 04 00 01, constant
  4-7    zero, constant
  8      a count, 0x0b to 0x29 across the 19 records
  9-10   zero, constant
  11     0x30, constant on all 19 in this range
  12-15  an EE RAM pointer

Byte 8 is the finding that survives: a small count varying per record, and the
one field here doing arithmetic rather than tagging.

Still open: what 0x30 at byte 11 means, what discriminates payload kinds given
the tag does not, and 0x80, which has no sample in 91 KB of RAM.
2026-10-12 02:22:06 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 0b1793d6af Map shrub packet tags onto three payload kinds
Dereferenced all nine pointers in the level 0 table that carry the 0x30 tag at
byte 11 and an EE pointer at 12..15, reading 32 bytes each. They fall into
exactly three classes, three payloads each, with no overlap.

A, Q16.15 fixed-point vertex data (3 of 9): every high byte 0x80 or 0x7c,
repeating on an 8-byte boundary, values differing per payload while the
4e 4e 4c 80 tail is shared by two.

  00936a70  8d 8c 80 80 89 87 7c 80 ... 4e 4e 4c 80
  0093cde0  8a 8a 7f 80 92 90 84 80 ... 4e 4e 4c 80
  009cf4f0  6e 6f 68 80 6e 6f 68 80 ... 54 54 51 80

B, a 0x30 sub-list with a repeated word (3 of 9), structurally identical
apart from that word (0xcd, 0xc0, 0xc8), all carrying 01 00 00 05 at offset 16
and a ".. c1 01 6e" at 20.

  009376f0  00 00 00 30 cd 00 00 00 cd 00 00 00 ...
  00998880  00 00 00 30 c0 00 00 00 c0 00 00 00 ...
  009d2da0  00 00 00 30 c8 00 00 00 c8 00 00 00 ...

C, an index/attribute list (3 of 9), both opening 00 c0 05 6d, then a count,
then a run of small ascending u16.

  00939700  00 c0 05 6d 3e 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ...
  009c1540  00 c0 05 6d 36 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ...

So the tag vocabulary measured on disc at record byte 7 -- 0x00, 0x30, 0x6d,
0x80 -- selects the payload:

  0x30  class B, the 00 00 00 30 sub-list
  0x6d  class C, the 00 c0 05 6d attribute list
  0x00  class A, the fixed-point vertex data

0x30 heads the class B payloads and 0x6d heads the class C payloads. That was
flagged as a single coincidence two commits back; three payloads each makes it
a rule.

0x80 has no sample among these nine and its meaning stays open.

Correction: the record spacing in this table is not uniformly 0x30. The find
output shows 0x30, 0x10, 0x30 between consecutive packet headers, and only 9
of the 5632 bytes scanned carry both the 0x30 tag and an EE pointer. The
earlier "0x30 spacing" was inferred from a truncated hit list.
2026-10-12 02:20:04 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod ad70e4c4be Follow shrub packet pointers: adjacent records hold unrelated payloads
The header pointers found in the previous commit are live, so they can be
dereferenced. Two records 0x30 apart in the level 0 table at 0x22a6b8 were
followed.

Range measured: savestate slot 1, reading 0x00936a70 (from the record at
0x22a6b8) and 0x009376f0 (from the record at 0x22a6e8), 64 bytes each.

The two payloads have nothing in common.

0x00936a70 is fixed-point vertex data:

  8d 8c 80 80  89 87 7c 80  8d 8c 80 80  89 87 7c 80
  4e 4e 4c 80  4e 4e 4c 80  4e 4e 4c 80  4e 4e 4c 80   repeating

Every high byte is 0x80 or 0x7c and the pattern repeats on an 8-byte boundary.
As s16 these are large negatives in a narrow band around -32500, consistent
with Q16.15 fixed point rather than f32, and with a stride of 4 s16 per vertex.

0x009376f0 is a tagged sub-list, not vertex data:

  00 00 00 30  cd 00 00 00  cd 00 00 00  cd 00 00 00
  cd 00 00 00  01 00 00 05  22 c1 01 6e  00 00 00 00

Structurally different: small integers, a repeating 0xcd, 0x30 tags in the high
byte. Nothing here is position data.

This supports the type reading of the header: the table is a tagged collection
where the tag selects the payload kind, not a uniform array. It also rules out
the alternative that the 16-byte tiling was one uniform record format with
varying fields -- two adjacent records with unrelated payloads is not that.

Still open: the mapping from tag value to payload kind. The 0x30 appearing in
record bytes 8-11 in RAM also heads the second payload, which is suggestive
but is one coincidence so far and is deliberately not written up as a link.
2026-10-12 02:18:18 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 3854e52019 Show the loader rewrites shrub packet headers into RAM pointers
Answering the "what is the tag byte" question needed an anchor. Searching live
RAM from scratch was the wrong way to get one: 04 04 00 01 matches unrelated
data at 0x1ac988 and there is no way to tell a real hit from a coincidental
one. The savestates are the anchor -- slot 1 is level 0, and searching one
gives candidates that can be checked rather than guessed at.

Range measured: savestate slot 1,
~/.config/PCSX2/sstates/SCUS-97268 (38996035).01.p2s, records at 0x22a6b8
onward, read with gc-trace read --state.

Result: 40+ records beginning 04 04 00 01 00 00 00 00 at 0x30 spacing -- the
packet framing identified on disc -- with the second half of each header
rewritten:

  disc:  04 04 00 01 | 00 00 00 00 | 00 00 00 05 | 00 80 0e 6c
  RAM:   04 04 00 01 | 00 00 00 00 | 13 00 00 30 | 70 6a 93 00

Bytes 0-7 unchanged; bytes 8-15 are not. On disc bytes 12-13 are the constant
00 80 and byte 15 the constant 6c; in RAM bytes 12-15 hold a pointer --
0x00936a70, 0x009376f0, 0x00937850, 0x00939c50 in consecutive records, all
inside EE RAM and ascending across the table as a walk of consecutive objects
would be. Byte 11 becomes 0x30 in every record seen, against a constant 0x05 on
disc, and bytes 8-9 hold a varying small value (0x13, 0x16, 0x24).

So the packet table at +0x40 is what the loader walks: span-relative on disc,
absolute in RAM. This was inferred from one class before; these 40+ records
show it directly.

Consequence for the tag bytes: the vocabularies at record bytes 7 and 15 are
real, but byte 15 sits in a field the loader overwrites with a pointer. Its
disc values are read as data by something rather than stored as a tag.

Not settled: whether byte 7's vocabulary is also rewritten, and whether 0x6d
marks payload the loader expands. That needs these records compared one by one
against their disc spans, which is cheap now that the anchor exists.
2026-10-12 02:15:30 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod d1aec9f866 Show shrub packet records are two tagged 8-byte halves, fixed length
Range measured: level 0, the 1636 sixteen-byte records following the header
across all 29 packets. Per-byte distinct counts, not pooled.

Method: count distinct values and zero frequency at each of the 16 positions,
then tabulate the joint distribution of the two low-entropy positions.

Result: fourteen positions are uniformly varied, 101 to 153 distinct values,
zero in 13% to 58% of records. Two are not:

  byte 7   4 distinct: 0 (1432), 0x30 (135), 0x6d (40), 0x80 (29)
  byte 15  2 distinct: 0 (1618), 0x6d (18)

Both sit in the last byte of an 8-byte half, eight bytes apart, and both take
values from a small closed vocabulary rather than the full byte range. The
joint distribution shows no record where both are non-zero, and 0x6d appears in
either position but never both:

  (0,0) 1414   (0,0x6d) 18   (0x30,0) 135   (0x6d,0) 40   (0x80,0) 29

Each 8-byte half carries a tag or subtype byte in its last position, from a
small closed set. The shared 0x6d is what suggests one vocabulary used twice
rather than two unrelated fields.

This answers the question the previous commit left open. There is no per-record
length field: the best candidate offsets hold the value 16 on at most 13% of
records, which is the chance rate for small integers, not a self-describing
record. The records are therefore fixed 16 bytes, and the tiling is not a
coincidence of variable-length records that happen to be multiples of 16.

Still open: what the four and two tag values mean, and what the 14 varied bytes
encode. The tag vocabulary is small enough to enumerate against known PS2
primitive lists, which is the reference to bring in next.
2026-10-12 02:09:56 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod e6dd60ec3a Characterise shrub mesh packets: 16-byte header, 16-byte tiling
The packet table decode left the packet contents open, with a warning that a
VIF reading had already been retracted once and needed a control rather than a
pattern match. This is that measurement.

Range measured: level 0, the 29 packets of the 6 successor-bounded shrub spans,
26640 bytes. Per-packet; nothing pooled.

Method: autocorrelation within the largest packet against a distribution
matched shuffled control, then per-byte distinct counts across all 29 packets.

Result 1: all 29 packet sizes are exact multiples of 16, and the internal stride
scan peaks at 16 (+0.283) with 32, 48, 64, 80 and 128 all elevated behind it --
the signature of a record array, not a coincidental spacing.

Result 2: record 0 is a 16-byte header. Constant across all 29 packets at bytes
0-3 (04 04 00 01), 4-11 (zero), 12-13 (00 80) and 15 (6c). Bytes 14 and 16-23
vary. The 04 04 00 01 prefix looks like a magic or format version.

Result 3: header byte 14 is echoed in the body. It takes values 06, 07, 0e and
11 across packets, and the same value appears at offset 12 of record 1 in every
packet sampled. A real repeated field, not two small values coinciding.

Not established: no header field matches the record count. The packet holds
1056/16 = 66 records and none of the candidate u32 or u16 header offsets at 8,
10, 12, 14, 16, 18 or 20 equals 66, 65 or 67 on more than half the packets. So
the count is either computed from a size field elsewhere in the span, or the
records are variable length and merely 16-byte aligned.

That distinction is unresolved and matters. Fixed 16-byte records make the
payload a flat table; variable records make the 16-byte alignment a coincidence
of every record being a multiple of 16 long. The stride scan cannot separate
the two, because both peak at 16.

The retracted VIF reading is not revived: the tiling is uniform across all 29
packets with no command-shaped tail, and a VIF packet would show a changing
command byte last rather than the constant 6c at header byte 15.

Next: read the record count from the packet table in the span rather than from
the packet header, which is what would separate the two readings.
2026-10-12 02:08:12 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod aa2b14ad66 The shrub mesh geometry is in the class blob after all
The open question from the shrub decode was where the mesh lives: the blob
looked like header, palette and optional billboard, with the 333 classes
without a billboard having nothing to draw. Answering it took the running
game, not the disc.

Diffing a loaded shrub class against its disc bytes in the live PCSX2 (level
1, class 1) shows what the loader rewrites: a table at +0x40 of (offset,
size) pairs, whose offsets are span-relative on disc and absolute in RAM with
the sizes unchanged -- all 21 entries matching offset for offset and size for
size -- plus a relocated palette pointer at +0x2c and a pointer at +0x18,
zero on disc, that asserts the parser enforces.

So the blob is header, packet table, packets, [billboard], palette: the mesh
was here the whole time. Why it was missed is the part worth recording --
data_offset points at the END of the span, so reading the body as
data_offset..span_end accounts for the last few hundred bytes and leaves the
20 KB in front of it unexamined. A correct bound and a body small enough to
look plausible are together enough to hide a region.

Range measured: every shrub span on the disc, 358 over 24 levels, each bounded
by its successor class or the located chunk container.

Method: read count at +0x28, then the entries at +0x40, and require them to
tile -- the first packet at align16(0x40 + count*8), every entry exactly size
past the previous, and the last ending at the palette, or 0x40 short of it on
the 25 spans that carry a billboard.

Result: 358 of 358 tile exactly, holding 2,239 packets. That is what pins the
field meanings: count is the packet count (1..55 on the disc), data_offset is
the palette's offset, and the earlier "the body is not sized by count" note
was true for a reason nobody had understood -- the count sizes the packets.

Shrub::packets() exposes them and returns None rather than a partial list
when a table does not tile. Still open: the packet contents (a VIF reading was
already retracted once, so this needs a control rather than a pattern match),
and the 0x20-byte records the loader points at from +0x18.
2026-10-12 02:02:01 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod c83f5104d2 Document the PCSX2 test setup
PCSX2 was set up and working but existed only in this machine's filesystem
and in people's heads, so every comparison looked like a one-off observation
rather than something re-runnable. The setup section in
docs/plan/pcsx2-verification.md now records where the emulator, the BIOS, the
disc, the savestates and the PINE socket are, how a state is captured, and
which command the disc integration tests need -- and AGENTS.md and README.md
point at it from their orientation sections. One operational detail worth
spelling out: the emulator's directory is lowercase (pcsx2), which is not
what people type.
2026-10-11 20:59:19 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod bbdb51e2f9 Verify level 1's tfrag lighting against the game
Savestate slot 2 is the second planet, so the comparison runs on a level with
a different geometry extent, light bank and runtime-set population:

  level1: 401/401 headers, 401/401 pointers, bank byte-identical
  vertices compared: 26470 (105880 colour bytes)  -- equal: 100.00%

The live emulator agrees with the savestate byte for byte. Level 1 is a
different planet, so the two fixes in the previous commit are not level-0
coincidences: the normal's z sign and the unlit-record base colour both hold
across 268,280 colour bytes on two levels.
2026-10-11 20:50:36 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 69a8398f6e Verify the tfrag lighting magnitudes against the running game
The harness that compares the port against the game's own memory existed but
had never been compiled: tools/trace did not build (27 errors, all in the
argument plumbing), and the tfrag_light.rs light-bank correction it motivated
was unverified. This finishes it and runs it, and the run finds two real bugs.

Result, on level 0 against three inputs -- the live emulator over PINE and two
PCSX2 savestates from the same level, agreeing byte for byte:

  headers matching the disc on invariant bytes: 833/833
  data pointers relocated as table + disc offset: 833/833
  light bank in RAM at 0x50ab20, byte-identical to the disc's
  vertices compared: 40600 (162400 colour bytes)
  equal: 162400 (100.00%)

The locator finds the level's tfrags block in RAM by tfrag 0's bounding
sphere and accepts a candidate only when every header matches the disc on the
bytes the game leaves alone and every data pointer is the relocated form, so
"the block was found" is itself a verification rather than an assumption. The
bank is searched in RAM by its exact section bytes, which is what settles its
framing: offset at +0x04, an i32 set count, twelve bytes of pad, then the sets.
The previous reading (offset at +0x00, count at +0x04) was wrong.

Two bugs the comparison found, both of which produced plausible output:

1. vertex_normal_bits negated x and y and left z positive, while
   NormalTable::normal negates all three. dA came out -0.707 where the game
   had +0.707, so max(dA, dA*wA) took the wrong branch and every vertex lit
   near its base colour: dark, but not wrong-dark. 95.88% agreement with the
   bug, 100.00% without.
2. A record whose select names a set the bank lacks drew transparent black.
   The game writes the record's base colour; 3,130 of level 0's 40,600
   vertices do this (select 0x000f, set 15 -- a runtime slot the level's
   directional bank does not have). The vertex is unlit, not invisible.

Both are now regression tests in the engine. The comparison prints the pass's
per-vertex terms (light_vertex_terms) for the first mismatches, because a
colour mismatch alone cannot be attributed and the comparison is worthless
without attribution -- that is how the second bug was identified from a
three-line read rather than guessed at.

Docs: docs/plan/pcsx2-verification.md records the harness, the result, the
two bugs and what to compare next; roadmap and level-assets.md stop carrying
lighting magnitudes as an open item. Findings reach tests only as numbers --
no test reads a savestate, a dump or a live emulator.
2026-10-11 19:51:25 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 2c7555fe16 Decode the shrub class blob: a 24-normal palette and a billboard record
The shrub body's payload encoding was the open question after the span-bound
work, and it answered itself once the R&C1 reference was in view: R&C1's shrub
class header keeps the field offsets R&C2 shows (o_class at 0x24, a count at
0x28, the data offset at 0x2c), which says which bytes to look at, and the disc
says what they hold.

Range measured: all 358 shrub class spans over the 24 levels that have them,
each bounded by its successor class or the located chunk container. Nothing
outside the spans is read.

Result. The body is a palette of 24 unit-length s16 normals -- s16 x, y, z and
a zero pad word per 8-byte record -- followed by all-zero padding records.
Three independent measurements, each of which fails for any other reading:

- all 8,592 live entries have squared length within 65,535 of 32767^2, and
  the bound is tight (the largest observed deviation is exactly 65,535). That
  is 32768^2 - 32767^2, which is what a unit vector scaled by 32768 produces
  when an axis-aligned normal quantises to -32768 and the positive axis clamps
  to 32767; components run the full s16 range and 1,765 entries are
  axis-aligned. A random s16 triple is off by about a billion, so one entry in
  fifteen thousand would pass by chance: all 8,592 pass.
- the padding records are always at index 24 or later and always all zero,
  never a live entry. That is what separates the palette from geometry, and it
  is the observation the three earlier stride-fitting attempts were missing.
- 17 classes carry a palette of 24 identical (0, 0, 1) entries. A position or
  index table cannot produce that; a normal palette for a flat-facing class
  must.

The header decodes as: sphere at +0x00 (centre + radius, radius positive on
all 358 spans, 1.72..41.57), size at +0x10, mode_bits and scratch at +0x14,
a zero word at +0x18, the billboard offset at +0x1c, and scale at +0x20. The
parser asserts the two invariants that hold without exception (scratch and the
reserved word are zero on all 358) plus a positive radius and scale, and
reports mode_bits rather than asserting it: it is 4 on 16 of the 358 spans.

The billboard offset is the strongest self-identification after o_class
because it is confirmed from a second file: it is non-zero on exactly the 25
classes whose core-index entry carries billboard texture fields, pairing
correctly both ways. At the offset sits R&C1's ShrubBillboard shape, register
block and all -- fade_distance, then TEX1_1 (K -233..-168, MMIN 4, address
0x14), TEX0_1 (index 1..4, address 0x06) and MIPTBP1_1 (address 0x34), all
three register addresses checked in the disc test.

Two corrections this produces, both recorded in docs/plan/level-assets.md
because the old readings were confidently wrong rather than merely
unverified:

- "reserved is 0 or a denormal" had the two u16 halves the wrong way round:
  the 16 non-zero spans are mode_bits = 4 with scratch = 0. As an f32 the word
  is still a denormal, so the PS2 reads zero either way -- but the field is a
  flag word, not a magnitude, which is exactly the FPU point worth making.
- "bounds" was tested as a min.xyz/max.xyz box, which holds on only 146 of
  358 spans, and the field was left unnamed as a result. It is a bounding
  sphere: the fourth float is positive on all 358 spans and the centres
  cluster near the class origin. The 146/358 figure was a property of the
  wrong question.

Still open: the three floats in the billboard record (they repeat
byte-identically across levels -- 16 distinct triples among 25 records, one on
four classes across levels 1, 4, 12 and 21 -- so they are shared art data
rather than dimensions), size, mode_bits, count, and where the shrub mesh
geometry lives. R&C1 puts the mesh packets in this blob; R&C2's blob holds
only the palette, so the 333 classes without a billboard must draw meshes from
somewhere else.
2026-10-11 13:33:37 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod ccea53807a Resolve the shrub region bound: the chunk container closes it
The shrub region's end was the last unlocated bound in core_data. It was not
in the core index, and unlike moby->tie it had no successor boundary to chain
against, so the last shrub class in every level ran out to the lump's end and
the aggregates over it (the "3.5M records / 28MB of shrub body") were
artifacts of that oversized span.

Range measured: for each level, from the last shrub class's geometry offset to
the constant trailer. Nothing outside that range is read.

Method: scan forward from the last shrub class for the pair (a) the constant
two bytes f6 7c sitting immediately in front of (b) a chunk signature -- a
16-byte header ending 0xff, ten zero bytes, then four or more 0xf0-tagged
offsets. The two halves are each weak alone, and the halves are measured
separately: the marker pair occurs 25 to 103 times in a 5 to 17 MB lump, so
matching it alone picks dozens of wrong offsets; the chunk shape matches
random data often enough to need four tagged offsets before it is believed.

Result: on all 27 levels the marker sits exactly two bytes before the first
chunk header, and the two parts of the signature are never found apart. No
chunk signature occurs inside any last shrub body, on any level. The three
levels without shrub (10, 25, 26) carry the same marker before the container
that closes tie instead, which is what makes the locator a property of the
region rather than a shrub rule.

Consequences:

- All 358 shrub class bodies are bounded and are whole 8-byte records. That
  was not assertable while the last class in each level ran to the lump's end,
  and it is the check the boundary earns its keep for.
- 9,600 records in total, against the 8,938 previously measurable in
  successor-bounded spans; 662 of them sit in the 24 last-class bodies. The
  shrub region totals 2,033,776 bytes across the 24 levels that have one.
- The chunk container is 25,775,850 bytes across 27 levels (1,236 chunks,
  22,562 records). The container measurements were previously taken over "the
  900,000 bytes before the trailer", a window that did not align to its real
  extent: on level 0 it is 690,302 bytes, and 27 of 1,123 chunks were
  truncated at that invented edge. chunk_containers_resolve_on_every_level now
  reads the region from core_layout instead of measuring backwards from the
  end of the lump.

core_layout takes core_data now: the container's start is the one bound that
cannot be derived from the index. It gains the chunks region, so every byte of
level-specific core_data belongs to a named region. Where the signature is not
found the end stays None -- the region is left visible rather than clamped to
the tail.

Still open: the marker's meaning (constant across 27 levels, at exactly this
position, unnamed) and the shrub body payload's encoding.
2026-10-11 06:20:48 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod aec462df21 Record that shrub span bounds are wrong, and what that invalidates
A follow-up measurement contradicted the body size implied by the
differential analysis, and the cause is bad span bounds rather than
anything in the format.

Shrub spans were bounded by the next shrub offset, with the last running
to the end of core_data. On level 0 that gives the final shrub class a
925,008-byte span, absorbing most of the lump's tail. The moby-to-tie
boundary is clean by comparison: last moby offset 13414592, first tie
13416192, exactly 1600 bytes apart.

What that invalidates:

- The 3.5M record / 28 MB body figure is an artifact of the oversized final
  span and should not be quoted.
- The "payload looks uniform-random" measurement ran over the same
  contaminated range, so it says nothing about shrub geometry either way.
- The differential result itself still stands -- it was computed on groups,
  and the groups used had bounded spans. The global aggregates built on it
  do not.

What is needed is the offset ending the shrub region. It is not in the core
index, and there is no obvious successor boundary the way moby->tie has one.

This is the second confident-sounding number in this format that turned out
to rest on a bad bound, the first being the VIF reading. Aggregates across
many spans are only as good as the span bounds under them, and bounds are
the easy thing to get wrong because nothing errors when you do.
2026-10-11 02:54:19 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 52228c14ed Retract the VIF reading of the shrub body
The previous commit concluded the shrub body's 6-byte payload was
VIF-packed, on the strength of recurring patterns like 7ea5 and 1ab6. That
was pattern matching dressed up as a conclusion, and a control kills it.

Decoding every 32-bit word of every shrub body as a VifCode:

  shrub bodies                    24.9% unpack, 128 distinct cmds
  uniform random                  25.1% unpack, 128 distinct cmds
  sound_bank (definitely not VIF) 19.0% unpack, 122 distinct cmds
  gs_ram (mixed)                  13.6% unpack, 128 distinct cmds
  moby class 0 span (known VIF)   40.1% unpack, 105 distinct cmds

Shrub sits on the random baseline and exercises all 128 possible command
bytes, which is what unstructured data looks like.

Worth being precise about what this does and does not show. The test is
weak -- even the known-VIF region only reaches 40.1%, well short of a
clean signal -- so this does not prove shrub is not VIF. It proves the
claim was never established, which is the part that was wrong.

Spotting three recurring byte values and naming them a format is the same
mistake as the three stride guesses it was meant to replace, one level
down. A hypothesis needs a discriminating test before it goes in a commit
message, and I skipped that step because the finding was welcome.

What still stands is the part that rests on differential analysis rather
than recognition: 8-byte records, 6 varying and 2 constant, 144 varying
bytes per group regardless of count. The payload's encoding is unknown.
2026-10-11 02:53:04 +02:00
ReaperOfVeriod 572753e7c1 Find the shrub body stride by diffing spans instead of fitting it
Stride-fitting the shrub body failed three times, so this attacks it from
the other side: group spans by (count, data_offset, tail length) and byte
diff every member of each group. Positions that differ across a group are
geometry; positions that never differ are structure.

The answer is blunt. 144 bytes vary in every group, whether that group has
count 1, 2, 3, 5 or 6 and a tail of 192, 208 or 240 bytes. The varying
data is not sized by count at all, which is why three stride guesses were
fitting the wrong thing -- and why they kept looking nearly plausible.

Those 144 bytes fall in runs of 6, every 8 bytes. The body is an array of
8-byte records: 6 varying bytes and 2 constant.

The payload is not half-floats -- decoding as half3 gives 245.25 and
-168.375, which no shrub has. The patterns (7ea5, 1ab6, 43d9, af80) and
their repetition are VIF-packed data, the same quadruple-word packing moby
and tfrag use. Filler around it is the PS2 NaN 0x7fff0000 rather than
zeros, which is why the body read as noise in the earlier dumps.

So the open question is the VIF code assignment, not the stride, and the
decoder written for tfrag is the obvious place to start.
2026-10-11 02:44:15 +02:00