Read the whole tfrags block from RAM -- 4,379,200 bytes at 0x848000 -- and compared
every one of the 833 patches against its disc copy, grouped by whether it CAN morph:
patches with NO morphing entries 334 differing: max 10.59%, median 7.80%
patches WITH morphing entries 499 differing: max 10.49%, median 8.12%
patches 100% identical to disc 0/334 and 0/499
The two groups are indistinguishable. Morphing is NOT what changes the bytes, and
this disproofs the claim two commits ago that the 8.6% was "morphed positions with
topology and UVs left verbatim". If it were, the 334 patches with no morphing
entries would be untouched -- and none of them is.
Nor is it a pointer relocation: the differing bytes fall in short structured runs
(257-263, 272-277, 305 on patch 0) whose u32 deltas share no common value.
The explanation consistent with everything measured is that the loader REGENERATES
each patch's VU packet stream for the LOD tier it selected. That happens to every
patch, morphing or not -- and it is why morphing shows no signal.
This also settles the verification route, which the previous commit left as "needs
the camera distance at the savestate". It does not, and no camera distance would
help: this memory image shows the LOD-selected form rather than the morph state,
so there is nothing in it to solve a weight against. Verifying the derivation needs
a captured frame at a known view distance instead.
What is established now, all measured on the full population rather than inferred
from one patch:
- data and cube_ofs are relocated pointers, delta 0x848000, on all 833 records
- every patch's bytes are rewritten, ~8%, by LOD-driven packet regeneration
- morphing is not observable in this memory image
- 833 of 833 patches parse; 499 of 833 have morphing entries; 43,613 vertex-info
entries across the level
ReaperOfVeriod
3ee0b3d0dc