Went after the GS's GIF packets in the tie AD-GIF region. Got a negative result,
a new universal invariant, and a retraction of my own first probe, which reached
the right answer for the wrong reason twice.
THE NEGATIVE RESULT
Tried the leading `5 * shader_count` quadwords of each packet (the
`bfc_distance` field's stated meaning) as VIF tags -- command in bits 0-6, size
in 7-14, mark in 15 -- and as GIF tags -- type in the top byte of word 1, length
in bits 0-2 of word 0. Both uniform. Over 13,042 records: 10,443 distinct values
of word 0, no GIF tag type above a count of 2. That is the control result rule 4
asks for, and it says stop.
THE RETRACTION
The first probe scanned `bfc_distance` quadwords, which for most records
overruns `vert_ofs` and runs into the vertex data. Pooling a control region with
vertex positions -- two populations with different structure -- gives a uniform
answer, so "not a tag stream" came out right from a measurement that was
measuring the wrong bytes. That is exactly the rule 3a failure, and I only caught
it because the hex dump I took next looked structured while the histogram said
random.
Re-measuring quadword 0 alone, on its own population, gives the same uniformity.
The conclusion survives; the reasoning did not, and both are recorded.
THE PARTITION, AND A NEW INVARIANT
The hex dump showed the packet layout directly:
q[0 .. vert_ofs) control 3..8 quadwords, peak at 5
q[vert_ofs .. +vert_size) vertices
q[vert_ofs+vert_size ..] scissor
and `scissor_ofs == vert_ofs + vert_size` holds on **15,219 of 15,219** records
across all 27 levels, including every one whose strip_count is non-zero. That is a
derived quantity stored explicitly, and it holds everywhere -- which is the check
that confirms the three regions really are laid out the way the existing packet
length formula assumed. It is now a hard check in invariants_hold(), which is
something the previous four could not be.
The fixture in tie.rs failed the moment I added it: it had vert_ofs 4 and
vert_size 0x20 with scissor_ofs 0x30, which is 4 + 0x24. The synthetic data was
never constrained by a relation that did not exist yet. Fixed to 0x24.
vert_ofs IS MIS-NAMED
It is not a vertex offset. It is the *length* of the leading control region, and
the vertex data begins at that many quadwords into the packet. The field name
stays because the on-disc order is fixed and everything already written about this
record says vert_ofs, but the doc now states what the value is and gives the
distribution.
STILL UNKNOWN
What the control region contains. Not standard DMA tags; possibly pre-merged GS
register writes in another framing, or per-class state rather than per-primitive
draw data. Recorded as an open question rather than guessed at.
23 + 19 + 58 + 156 + 22 = 278 passing with the disc present (disc binary 35.67s),
clippy clean.
ReaperOfVeriod
9bb04cca7b