Files
Going-Commando/docs/formats/core-data-regions.md
T
ReaperOfVeriod d397a1ee34 Differential analysis finds no constant substructure at stride 368
Range measured: level 0, 16047040..16737344. 1875 whole 368-byte records
from the region start, variation checked across the first 60.

Method: the differential analysis that identified the shrub body -- compare
records byte by byte, record which positions differ.

Result: all 368 positions vary. No constant field, no padding, no header
inside a record. The shrub body separated immediately into a varying payload
and a constant two-byte tail; this format has nothing constant to separate.

That is consistent with the autocorrelation peak rather than in tension with
it. Checking which positions carry the 368-stride matches over 20000
positions gives 168 exact 4-byte repeats, distributed evenly at 0.84% across
all four byte offsets. Whole 4-byte sequences recur at exactly 368 while no
individual position is constant -- consistent with records containing entries
that repeat at a fixed relative index, not with a fixed-layout record.

So the 368 stride stands and the records stay unidentified. Worth recording
that the shrub method failed here for a specific and predictable reason: it
needs something constant to latch onto. Applying a method that worked
elsewhere is not the same as it applying here, and saying so is cheaper than
the next person assuming the technique transfers.
2026-10-11 03:31:31 +02:00

245 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# core_data region bounds
How a level's `core_data` lump divides up, and how each region is bounded.
## The rule
A region's end is the **next region's start**, never `core_data.len()`. The
last region in a layout is the exception, and when its successor is unknown the
end is `None` rather than a guess.
This exists because region bounds were being re-derived per format during
probing, usually by running from one known offset to the next with the last
span running to the end of the lump. On level 0 that made the final shrub class
a 925,008-byte span absorbing most of the lump's tail. Every aggregate computed
over it -- record counts, value distributions, "this data looks random" -- was
silently wrong, and nothing errored.
`gc_formats::regions::core_layout` computes these once. Callers use it rather
than inventing their own.
## Layout
| region | start | end |
|------------|----------------|----------------------|
| `tfrags` | 0 | `occlusion` |
| `occlusion`| `occlusion` | `sky` |
| `sky` | `sky` | `collision` |
| `collision`| `collision` | first moby class |
| `moby` | first moby | first tie class |
| `tie` | first tie | first shrub class |
| `shrub` | first shrub | lump length − 0x38A10 |
Class regions start at the lowest non-zero geometry offset in their class
table. A zero entry means *absent*, not position zero -- the same trap the
occlusion and collision headers each fell into separately.
Not every level has every region: level 10 has no occlusion and no shrub.
## The constant trailer
Comparing all 27 levels byte-for-byte from the end: the last **231,952 bytes
(0x38A10)** of every level's `core_data` are identical. Level-specific content
therefore ends at `len - 0x38A10`, and the final region is bounded there rather
than at `core_data.len()`.
This is what closes shrub. Across the 24 levels that have a shrub region it
gives **24,442,928 bytes** total, and it is the same bound the disc test
asserts on every level.
What the trailer *is* is not established. It may be fixed data, or padding
from a fixed-size decompression buffer. Either way it is constant, which is
all that is needed to bound the tail.
## Open: what was in the region before it
The offset ending the shrub region is not in the core index.
Texture texels do **not** bound it. They sit before moby, not after shrub: on
level 0 the texel range is 3539328..5326208 while the last shrub class starts
at 16044288, leaving ~925 KB of real, non-zero data after the last shrub class
that nothing yet accounts for.
`core_layout` reports `end: None` for shrub on the 24 levels that have one, and
the disc test asserts it, so the gap stays visible rather than being papered
over by clamping to the end of the lump.
## Correction: it is mostly texture data, not an unnamed region
Adding the region table to `gc-extract probe` made the gap visible
immediately, which is the point of printing it.
On level 0:
```
collision 2615232 .. 8832192 6216960 bytes
```
but collision's own header declares a payload of 903,248 bytes. So the range
between the collision header and the first moby class is **6.2 MB**, and
almost none of it is collision.
The first conclusion drawn from this -- that ~6.2 MB of unidentified data sat
between collision and moby, possibly `moby_anim` -- **was wrong**, and it was
wrong because of the same failure that produced the other two bad numbers this
session: quoting a figure before bounding it.
Checking the bytes rather than just the sizes: the range is dominated by 8-bit
indexed texture data. Byte-value concentration (a texture block uses a small
palette; code and collision data does not) puts 18 of 21 sampled 4 KB blocks
under 200 distinct byte values, against 249 for tfrags and 209 for collision.
So the real layout is:
| region | start | end |
|------------|----------|------------------|
| collision | 2615232 | 3518544 |
| textures | 3518848 | ~8832192 |
| moby | 8832192 | first tie class |
The texture table's `data_offset` values only reach 5326208, which is why the
gap looked real: mip chains extend well past the last entry's offset. A region
sized from a table of first-level offsets understates the data it points at.
The "3 of 21 blocks not texture-like" figure in the previous revision was an
artifact of sampling every 256 KB. Re-scanned at 4 KB granularity the whole
range is texture data: ~100 blocks stand out, and looking at them they are
smooth gradient ramps -- sky and fog texture, exactly what gradient texels look
like. A noisy gradient has a high distinct byte count without being code.
So the range between collision and moby is **entirely texture data**, and there
is no separate `moby_anim` region there. Combined with the correction above,
two claims made about this range have now been wrong: the "6.2 MB of unknown
data" and the "3 unexplained blocks".
Where `moby_anim` actually lives is therefore still open, but it is not here.
The remaining candidate is the unresolved tail after the last shrub class,
which on level 0 is ~925 KB of real, non-zero data that nothing yet accounts
for.
## Where shrub data ends, and the region after it
**Range measured:** for each level, the last shrub class's `data_offset` field
(`class + 0x2c`) through to the start of the constant trailer. Nothing outside
that range is read.
**Method:** the last shrub class's body is an array of 8-byte records whose
final two bytes are `00 00`. Scanning forward in 8-byte steps for the first
record whose trailing pair differs locates the body's end. This is a search
for a specific stated pattern, not a statistic, so it either finds the
boundary or reports that it did not.
**Result:** on **24 of 24** levels the boundary lands exactly on an 8-byte
record boundary. Body lengths are 192, 208, 224 or 240 bytes -- the same sizes
seen when shrub classes were grouped and diffed earlier.
On level 0:
| what | range | bytes |
|---|---|---|
| last shrub class data | 16046800 .. 16047040 | 240 |
| **next region** | 16047040 .. 16737344 | **690,304** |
| constant trailer | 16737344 .. 16969296 | 231,952 |
So the 690,304 bytes between the last shrub class and the trailer are a
distinct region, not shrub data. What they contain is not established.
Two things are worth noting about how this was found, given the rule in
`AGENTS.md`: the earlier NaN-filler search found nothing at the start of this
range and was about to conclude the body had zero length, which would have been
wrong. The last shrub class is a real class with real data, and the NaN filler
only appears in degenerate ones. Checking the actual byte pattern rather than
concluding from a failed heuristic is what caught it.
### First structure in the region after shrub
**Range measured:** level 0, `16047040 .. 16737344` (690,304 bytes), starting
at the first byte after the last shrub class's 240-byte body. Nothing outside
that range is read.
**Method:** reading the bytes at `+0x20` as `u32` shows ten consecutive
entries whose low halves increase by a constant **0x94 (148)**, followed by a
zero. Read as u32 the high half is `0xf000` for the first nine and `0x0a40`
for the tenth, so the table is ten entries long and ends at `+0x48`
(absolute `16047112`).
**Result, stated plainly:** a ten-entry table on a 148-byte stride. What the
entries mean, what 148 refers to, and why there are ten, are all unestablished.
Ten does not match any count already known for this level -- 238 moby
classes, 74 tie, 7 shrub, 93 tfrag textures -- so this is not yet tied to any
structure elsewhere in the lump.
### Follow-up: the 148 stride is a coincidence
Treating the ten entries' low halves as offsets from the region start lands on
blocks exactly 148 bytes apart, the first nine of which begin `08 00` followed
by a 16-bit id stepping by 0x40. That is a convincing-looking structure and it
does not survive being extended: walking the same 148-byte stride across the
rest of the region, **only 14 of 4657 blocks** start with `08 00`. The first
nine agree and then the pattern breaks.
So the ten entries are not a pointer table. The constant stride held for
eight consecutive values, which is far more than chance should produce and far
less than a structure needs.
Recorded because the lead was committed as a lead and this is where it goes.
Nothing else about the region has been identified: it is real, non-zero data
of unknown type, bounded, and unopened beyond these ~150 bytes.
## The region after shrub has a repeating structure at stride 368
**Range measured:** level 0, `16047040 .. 16737344`, sampled as the first
65,536 bytes. Cross-checked on every level that has the region, each sampled
the same way from its own region start.
**Method:** autocorrelation. For each candidate stride, count how often a
4-byte sequence at offset *i* repeats at *i + stride*, as a fraction of
comparable positions. A random control of the same size is measured
identically and reads flat at 0.0000 for every stride, so the statistic
discriminates.
**Result:**
| stride | region match rate |
|---|---|
| 368 | 0.1110 |
| 340 | 0.0935 |
| 337–339 | 0.026–0.029 (background) |
| random control | 0.0000 |
Stride **368** is the strongest peak. On level 0, 340 is a secondary peak
well clear of the background; the two differ by 28, which is unexplained.
**Cross-check:** the peak stride was recomputed independently for every level
that has the region, and **all 24 peak at exactly 368**. That is the part
that makes this worth recording -- a single level's peak could be a property
of that level's data, but 24 of 24 agreeing is a format invariant.
What a 368-byte record *is* remains unestablished. This is the same position
the shrub body was in before differential analysis identified its records,
and the same method is the obvious next step.
### Differential analysis at stride 368: no constant substructure
**Range measured:** level 0, `16047040 .. 16737344`. 1,875 whole 368-byte
records from the region start; variation checked across the first 60.
**Method:** the same differential analysis that identified the shrub body --
compare records byte by byte and record which positions differ.
**Result:** **all 368 positions vary.** There is no constant field, no padding
and no header inside a record. Unlike the shrub body, where differential
analysis immediately separated a varying payload from a constant two-byte
tail, this format has nothing constant to separate.
That does not contradict the autocorrelation peak. Checking which byte
positions carry the 368-stride matches over 20,000 positions: 168 exact 4-byte
repeats, distributed evenly at 0.84% across all four byte offsets. So whole
4-byte sequences recur at exactly 368 while no individual position is constant
-- consistent with records containing entries that repeat at a fixed relative
index, rather than with a fixed-layout record.
**So the 368 stride stands and the records remain unidentified.** The shrub
method failed here not because it was the wrong tool but because it needs
something constant to latch onto, and there is nothing.