1cfe7445019390ef57d3733a5f41609af99f1d98
165
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ReaperOfVeriod
|
1cfe744501 |
Settle the tie packet length, and correct the retraction that hid it
Range measured: every tie LOD block on the disc -- 2,177 blocks, 13,042
consecutive record pairs.
A record's pointer is where its packet starts, so the distance between
consecutive pointers IS a packet's length, with no reference to any field.
Comparing that against the record's own fields:
packet_quadwords = vert_ofs + vert_size + scissor_size
12,927 of 12,927 record pairs whose strip_count is zero
0 of 115 record pairs whose it is not
The partition is exact: every record with a non-zero strip_count is an
exception and no record with a zero one is. So the fourth term is 0 quadwords
whenever strip_count == 0, and something else -- measured 0..19 quadwords, and
NOT equal to strip_count -- whenever it is not. R&C1's strip_count is a strip
count and strips are variable-length data, so a non-zero count most likely
adds per-strip bytes this cannot see; that is a hypothesis, labelled as one.
TieRecord gains packet_quadwords and packet_quadwords_are_known. The latter is
the honest gate, and the disc test asserts both sides of the partition rather
than the aggregate.
This also corrects this file's own retraction of the same formula, and the
retraction was the error rather than the claim. A formula of this shape was
derived at 61 of 61 pairs, then "retracted" as not reproducing (0 of 13,042).
The re-measurement had swapped strip_count for scissor_ofs in the fourth term
and put the blame on the block set. Re-measured with the term the first pass
had, it matches on 12,927 of 13,042 and the 115 exceptions are exactly the
non-zero strip_count records.
Worth recording because it is the same shape as two other entries in this
file: a retraction is not automatically more careful than the claim it
retracts, and the re-measurement that "disproved" this one changed the thing
being measured. The lesson on the other side is what saved it -- the first
measurement was over 61 pairs, not a population, and had it stayed there the
formula would have looked universal. A small sample and a bad re-measurement,
near-misses in opposite directions.
What this unblocks: the payload can be sliced per packet, which was the
prerequisite for decoding what it holds.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
4abce518e5 |
Decode the overlay's load base, from its own profiler table
Range measured: all 27 levels' overlays. The overlay carries the game's profiler menu definition -- a run of 8-byte padded names (normal, camera, cam+chr, volume, bars, render, mobys, ties, shrubs, cpu/gpu, occl, ...) followed by runs of absolute RAM addresses that point back at those same names. On every level the four addresses after normal/camera/cam+chr/volume, each minus its target name's overlay offset, give the same number: 1,735,792. That is field_00 - 16, where field_00 is the header word that read 1,735,808 on all 27 levels with nothing attached to it. The overlay is loaded with its 16-byte header stripped, so overlay offset X sits at RAM X + 1,735,792. OverlayHeader::ram_address carries it, and the disc test asserts the derivation holds on all 27 levels. Confirmed, not only derived: level 0's RAM 0x1acf80 holds "normal\0camera\0cam+chr\0volume\0", byte-identical to overlay 0x5310, and 0x5310 + 1735792 == 0x1acf80. All four names land where the overlay's own table says. `gc-trace verify-overlay-base` runs that check, savestate-gated the same way as the tie and tfrag ones. The overlay is relocated, not copied: only 37.67% of level 0's is byte-identical at the base, and the 256-entry sine table -- at overlay 0xb650c -- is not at 0xb650c + base. So the base locates the overlay's image, but individual tables inside it move. That is the shape of a loader applying relocations, and it means the base is necessary but not sufficient for reading the game's tables. The value of the base is that any overlay offset can now be carried to a RAM address, which is the prerequisite for reading the game's live level state -- the thing the tie relocation and tfrag lighting checks had to work around. Two things get deleted rather than finished. The collision u16 table was probed four ways -- magnitude distribution, level-independence, run starts, run lengths -- and every one came back level-dependent: the run-start pattern is identical on 1 of 19 levels. So the first 1024 bytes of the collision payload are data, not a fixed table, and nothing was decoded. Recorded as the negative it is rather than left as four half-findings. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
55ea619b4c |
Decode the tie class header's +0x0c word: three LOD record counts
Range measured: every tie class on the disc, 1,864 classes over all 27 levels. Method: read the word at class +0x0c as four bytes, and read the record counts independently from the blocks themselves -- follow packets[lod] to the block, walk to the 0xf6 terminator, and count the 16-byte records the block header's data_offset names. Two paths to the same number, so the check is not circular. Result: the byte at +0x0c is the LOD 0 record count, +0x0d is LOD 1's and +0x0e is LOD 2's, on 1,864 of 1,864 classes. Classes with an absent LOD agree too: a zero packets[lod] gives a zero count and the byte is zero. This closes the file's oldest lie about the tie header. The comment in TieClassHeader::parse read "0x0c: the 64 light-slot normals offset. Read past, not decoded" -- inherited from R&C1's layout, where the word genuinely is an offset. On R&C2 it is not an offset at all; it is three counts, and R&C1 carries the same quadruple at +0x20. Skipping the field was the right action on the wrong information: the field was unknown only because R&C1's map was applied to R&C2's bytes. TieClassHeader gains packet_counts, and tie_class_header_counts_records_per_lod asserts the agreement. The fourth byte, +0x0f, is left unnamed. It ranges 1..15, and the obvious following of R&C1 -- the shader/ad-gif total -- disagrees on 1,827 of 1,864 classes, which is 2% agreement where a count would expect 100%. It is recorded as unidentified rather than given a name that fits a fiftieth of the population. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
f1f0b517a5 |
Pin the extracted tree, which every disc test reads and nothing verified
data/gc-files.tsv pins the ISO files, and unpacks_and_matches_the_committed_table checks that unpacking reproduces them. But the tie, collision, tfrag and chunk tests do not unpack -- they read ~/Documents/gc-extracted, a directory on disk that nothing in the repository checks. A stale or hand-edited file there would have every measurement built on it still pass, quietly. Three claims this session returned confident numbers while describing the parser rather than the disc -- has_uniform_record_length, "1,509 chunks uniform", the moby class-ID scan -- and a test whose data source is unverified is that same hazard one level down. data/gc-extracted.tsv now records SHA-1 and size for all 5,237 files in that tree, 324 KiB, sizes and hashes only, no content. It is the output of `gc-extract unpack`, whose ISO files are already pinned by the other table, so it is grounded transitively rather than by assertion. the_extracted_tree_matches_the_committed_table walks the table and checks every row's size and hash against disk. It asserts all 5,237 are checked -- so a truncated table fails rather than passing on a prefix -- and reports the first few missing or mismatched paths when it does. Current result: 5,237 of 5,237 match. This does not retroactively validate the three retracted claims. What it does is remove the possibility that any of the surviving ones rests on a directory that could have been anything. 246 tests, clippy clean. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
8ccc3ddda4 |
Retract the uniformity claim everywhere it still stood, including the API docs
The record-length retraction had been applied to the tests and to the section
that discovered the problem, but the same claim was still standing in four other
places -- including the rustdoc for has_uniform_record_length(), which is what a
caller would actually read:
crates/gc-formats/src/chunks.rs:206 "Measured: true for 1,509 of 1,509 chunks"
docs/roadmap.md:448 "uniform record length (1,509 of 1,509)"
docs/formats/core-data-regions.md a whole section titled
"Every chunk has a uniform record length"
All three now say 257 of 1,509, and the method's rustdoc explains WHY the old
number was an artefact -- that resolve sliced at the first offset delta, so every
record came out the same length by construction and the predicate was confirming
the parser back to itself.
That section also contained a withdrawal, and the withdrawal was wrong:
"This withdraws the previous commit's variable-length type. That came from
taking minlen/maxlen over all of a type's records at once, pooling across
chunks; rule 3a's pooled claim, third time this session."
The pooling rule fired correctly and was overruled by a measurement with no
independent content. The per-chunk check that should have caught the pooled
signal was itself reporting the parser's own slicing, so it agreed with the wrong
answer for the same reason the original claim did. Two errors stacked: a real
signal dismissed by a rule that had been right twice already, and a predicate
that could not have told the difference.
This is the third time this session that a test was asserting the parser's
behaviour rather than the disc's, and the third time it was the only thing
standing between a claim and a retraction. has_uniform_record_length is the
clearest instance: a predicate named after a property of the data, returning a
confident answer about the code.
245 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
2d3880b624 |
The class-ID retraction goes further: the claim was wrong before the fix
Pinned down the one slot that still cleared 100x after the record-boundary fix,
and it is the artifact this section was written to guard against.
The discriminator the original version lacked: a slot that really carries moby
class IDs must SPAN the ID space, so some of its values land above a level's moby
count. The artifact does the opposite.
type slot enrichment distinct values ABOVE the moby count
0xd76cc453 6 305x 9 0
0xf2ef4275 34 64x 9 341
0xf2ef4275 7 46x 16 412
0xf2ef4275 14 34x 16 432
0xd76cc453 9 32x 28 702
The 305x slot's nine values are 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 -- all under a
level's ~215 moby classes, so every one scores as a hit and 65536/215 = 305x.
Nine small numbers is not a class-ID array. Every slot that actually spans the ID
space scores 10x to 64x, which is chance.
So the original claim's own numbers gave it away and it was not read that way:
"5 to 42 distinct values at 153x to 289x" is exactly the artifact's shape -- a
handful of small values, none above the count. The record-boundary fix was never
what made this claim wrong. It was wrong when written, and the retraction is
complete rather than the partial one I committed two turns ago.
The test now separates the two quantities: slots clearing 100x (currently 1,
expected to remain the artifact) and slots clearing 100x WHILE ALSO having values
above the moby count (currently 0, must stay empty). That second number is the
one that means something, and a slot appearing in it would be the first genuine
evidence of a class-ID array anywhere in the container.
Worth noting the per-SLOT bookkeeping: the count of values above the moby count
is keyed by (type, slot), not by type. A first attempt keyed it by type and the
artifact type passed the check on the strength of its ordinary slots -- 783 of its
own values sat above the count at other slots. The check has to be about the
individual slot, or one good slot launders a bad one.
245 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
d159195510 |
General guard for the over-read class, and the audit showing it was unique
Searched for the pattern that caused the over-read -- a record length derived from
the first difference between two offsets:
grep -rn "\[1\] - \[0\]" crates/gc-formats/src/*.rs
crates/gc-formats/src/chunks.rs:357 (offsets[1] - offsets[0])
One hit, in the one parser that walks an explicit offset table.
The others slice contiguous regions with chunks_exact -- shrub's 8-byte palette
records, tie's 16-byte packet headers, tfrag's 4-byte tables. There a length
cannot run past the next element, because chunks_exact derives each boundary from
the region's own length rather than from a sample of the spacing. Shrub's mesh
packets carry an explicit offset AND size, so they state their length instead of
inferring it.
The damage was bounded by a structural property worth stating: only a format with
an offset table AND a derived stride can over-read, and exactly one format had
both. That is a more useful fact than the retraction was on its own -- it says
where else to look if another one turns up.
The guard is positive rather than a comment.
chunk_records_neither_overlap_nor_leave_gaps asserts across all 27 levels that
every record but the last is exactly its own offset delta long, that there are
1,509 chunks, and that 1,252 have ragged deltas. A regression to a single sampled
stride fails immediately and names the chunk and the record.
245 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
92aa0fe49f |
Audit what the record-boundary fix contaminated: one retraction, one survivor
The fix changed record lengths in 1,252 of 1,509 chunks, so every committed claim
computed over record bytes needed re-checking rather than assuming. All of them:
claim reads verdict
1,509 chunks / 34,491 records offsets unaffected
1,262 chunks with a leading-byte bucket rule record byte 0 unaffected
1,235 chunks with an index rule record bytes 1-2 unaffected
34,432 of 34,491 records 8-byte aligned record byte 0 unaffected
55 strides, all multiples of 4 offsets unaffected
moby class IDs in one slot per chunk type record bytes RETRACTED
17-21% byte positions constant record bytes SURVIVES
Only claims that scanned across a record's BODY were at risk. The rest read a
record's first three bytes, which an over-read never touched -- it appends to the
end. That asymmetry is why the damage was contained to one claim, and it is the
argument for preferring claims anchored at record starts.
The survivor was the obvious candidate for contamination, so it is worth being
precise about it. Re-measured with each record bounded by its successor, and
comparing only the span every record in the chunk has (they are no longer all the
same length):
lowest level 8 16.7%
highest 20.0%
Still inside the documented band. Previously this lived only in a doc comment on
the layout test; it is now asserted, in
chunk_records_share_a_layout_measured_by_constant_byte_positions, over all 27
levels with a 10-30% band so a real change reports itself rather than sliding.
The module documentation is corrected to the measured range and now says outright
that records in one chunk are not all the same length, since that is the fact a
reader would otherwise have to rediscover.
244 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
4fab4d0359 |
Fix the record boundaries after all, and retract a claim built on the bug
I reverted the record-boundary fix last commit on the grounds that "fixed-length
records plus inter-record padding" and "variable-length records" produce the same
offset table. That reasoning was wrong, and cheaply so.
stride is the FIRST offset delta. On the 92, 88, 84, 92, 92, 92, 84, 88 chunk,
if every record were stride bytes long then records 1, 2, 6 and 7 would each run
past the START of their own successor. Records are addressed by an explicit
offset table; they cannot overlap. The padding model is not merely less likely
than variable-length, it is incoherent -- I should have checked that before
reverting a correct fix on the strength of a plausible-sounding alternative.
So: resolve now measures each record against its successor again, with the
overlap argument written into the documentation so it cannot be re-litigated
without someone noticing it is arithmetic.
THE RETRACTION, which is the substantive part:
Three tests broke. Two were straightforward, but the third was not.
* constant_positions indexed records as if they were all the same length. Now
that they are not, it compared past the short ones. It takes the minimum
length instead.
* "1,509 of 1,509 chunks have uniform record length" -- which was true only
because the parser sliced every record at one stride, so the test was
confirming the parser's behaviour back to itself. It now asserts 257 uniform
and 1,252 ragged, and the sum is checked against 1,509 so neither number can
drift alone.
* moby_class_ids_sit_in_one_slot_per_chunk_type asserted >= 20 chunk types
carry a slot of moby class IDs at 38x-289x enrichment. It now finds 2, of
which 1 clears 100x. RETRACTED. That test scored records that carried 4 to 8
bytes of the NEXT record, which read as extra fields and lifted every slot's
apparent hit rate. The general claim -- one class-ID slot per chunk type
across the container -- does not hold. The test asserts 2, asserts 1 strong,
and asserts the count has NOT returned to 20, so the retraction cannot quietly
lapse back into the claim.
That is a committed finding withdrawn on the strength of a parser bug. It is also
the second time in this area that a clean number -- >= 20 types, 1509 uniform --
was really the parser describing itself.
243 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
5f0396e3d7 |
Measure every chunk's record offsets; the cause is ambiguous, so no fix
The previous commit fixed on one signature. Measuring all of them shows the
pattern is the norm. Taking delta = offset[i+1] - offset[i] against the chunk's
own first delta, levels 0-2, 2,953 deltas:
0 1,723 -4 549 +4 426
-8 146 +8 32
-12 71 +12 21
-16 34 +16 4
-20 27 +20 1
-24 13
Every deviation is a multiple of 4 and most are exactly +/-4; worst observed is 24
bytes in a 7-record chunk. 1,252 of 1,509 chunks have at least one, across 66 of
74 signatures.
WHY THIS DOES NOT BECOME A FIX
Two models produce this offset table and they are observationally identical:
1. records are genuinely variable-length, padded to 4 bytes, stride = largest
2. records are fixed at stride and the offset table carries inter-record
padding, so the gap to the next record is record + padding
Nothing in the offsets distinguishes them. Both say where records start. Both
produce 92, 88, 84, 92, 92, 92, 84, 88 for the case already discussed.
I wrote the change that slices each record against its successor -- model 1 -- and
then reverted it. Two things came out of writing it:
First, it broke three tests, which is the informative part. Those tests assert
"1,509 of 1,509 chunks have uniform record length" and they passed BECAUSE the
parser forced uniformity by slicing every record at a single stride. They were
asserting the parser's behaviour back at itself, and would have kept passing
forever regardless of what the disc contains.
Second, shipping it would have replaced one unverified model with another and
silently changed the record boundaries of 1,252 chunks on the strength of a
guess. The repo's own rule applies: a heuristic count is not an identification,
and here it is not even a count -- it is two equally good explanations of one
table.
WHAT WOULD SETTLE IT: a field inside the record whose end is independently
observable -- a terminator, a count implying a length, or a known value pinning
its position. Under model 2 the disputed bytes are padding and will be uniform or
zero; under model 1 they are data and will not be. For [75 42 ef] those 8 bytes
read a0 00 27 20 at both the tail of one slice and the head of the next, which is
arithmetic rather than evidence, since it is the same eight bytes seen twice.
The uniform model stays, the ambiguity is recorded in resolve()'s documentation
and here, and the 1,509-of-1,509 assertion stands as a statement about what the
parser does rather than about what the disc contains. 243 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
b9e9835639 |
A parser defect: one chunk type is not fixed-stride, and over-reads
[75 42 ef f2 71 b5] -- the signature that is both level-specific and
variable-length -- makes three chunks per level, 81 total:
stride 76 deltas [76, 76, 76, 76, 76, 76, 76, 76] uniform
stride 92 deltas [92, 88, 84, 92, 92, 92, 84, 88] NOT uniform
stride 104 deltas [104, 104, 104, ...] uniform
Identical on all 27 levels: 27 chunks of each shape, three shapes, no others.
So "this signature has strides {76, 92, 104}" is a misdescription. It has three
chunk shapes, one of which is not fixed-stride at all. The parser derives one
stride per chunk and resolve slices every record at that length.
The cost, precisely: records are read at the offset table's positions, so every
record STARTS correctly -- no misalignment. But each is sliced at 92 bytes, while
two of the eight are 88 and two are 84, so four records over-read by 4 and 8
bytes and carry the head of the next record inside them. Bounds checking holds;
this is a data-correctness bug, not a safety one. It is precisely the kind that
produces plausible-looking fields offset by four bytes, which is how it would
have gone unnoticed had the stride table not been collected per signature rather
than inferred per region.
It also explains why this signature was previously flagged as breaking the 8-byte
alignment rule: its records genuinely are not a uniform multiple.
The right fix is for resolve to use offset deltas for a chunk whose deltas are
not uniform. Not taken here -- the delta sequences are asserted first, so if the
data ever becomes uniform the test fails and asks for the model to be revisited,
rather than the model quietly absorbing the exception.
Asserted in chunk_type_75_ef_has_one_variable_length_chunk_per_level, with the
exact sequences [76x8], [92,88,84,92,92,92,84,88], [104x8] and 27 of each.
A near-miss worth recording, because it would have made a tidy false claim: the
leading u16 of these records appeared to step by exactly 0x50 (80) across all nine
of the 76-byte chunk. Reading at the real offsets gives b1a5, a529, 047e, a529,
04f0, a529, 0562, a529, 05d4 -- no progression at all. The apparent 80-byte step
came from comparing the wrong bytes, and "records are indexed by 80" is exactly
the kind of finding that gets reported on sight.
243 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
af62032ddc |
Most of the chunk container is level-independent: 65 of 74 signatures
Comparing every chunk record against the same record index in the other 26
levels, across all 74 signatures:
65 of 74 every record byte-identical in all 27 levels
9 of 74 level-specific
0 ragged no signature appeared with different record counts per level
The nine that vary:
[5d 44 13] [75 42 ef] [7f 44 ee] [82 c4 2f] [96 c3 37]
[a2 44 a5] [c6 c3 ef] [df c3 ea] [f3 c4 b9]
This reframes the container. 65 of 74 chunk types are static tables the game ships
unchanged in every level -- constants and lookups, not level content. The largest
by record count are all in that group: [38 c4 7e] stride 328 with 90 records per
level, [a9 c4 d8] stride 308 with 90, [3d c4 9e] stride 368 with 77.
The consequence is about method, and it is worth being blunt about. For a
level-specific type, comparing levels is the strongest lever available: a field
that moves with the level is identifiable by correlating it with something known.
For the other 65 there is nothing to compare -- one copy of the data, repeated 27
times -- so they must be decoded structurally, from what the bytes are. A future
decoder that reaches for per-level comparison as its first tool will find it
useless on the majority of the container.
[75 42 ef] is both level-specific AND the one signature with three strides. A
type that is both variable-length and level-varying is the most informative one
here, and is where per-type field decoding should start.
How this was found, including the wrong turn:
The first look at [53 c4 6c d7 9a 43] (stride 108) showed 45 of 108 byte positions
varying WITHIN a chunk and 810 records all distinct -- which reads like per-record
data. Counting distinct values per u32 slot across all 810 records contradicted
that: 29 to 30 distinct values across 27 levels, i.e. about one per level.
Both readings were wrong because they measure different things. The 45 positions
vary between records within a level; the u32 counts were low because the same 30
values recur in every level. Comparing record i across levels settled it: all 30
records are byte-identical in all 27 levels, and zero byte positions vary across
levels.
Had the u32 distinct counts been the only measurement, the conclusion would have
been "one value per level" -- the opposite of the truth, describing a per-level
parameter table that does not exist. The within-chunk and across-level views had
to be taken together to get a true one.
Asserted in most_chunk_signatures_are_level_independent. 242 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
59dba3e58d |
Chunk records: the stride table, and the exception pinned by name
Walked every chunk on all 27 levels, grouped by six-byte header signature:
1,506 chunks, 34,415 records, 74 distinct signatures
55 distinct strides, 52..640, every one a multiple of 4
73 of 74 signatures use exactly one stride
The exception is asserted rather than skipped, because "every type is uniform"
is precisely the claim that quietly stops being true:
[75 42 ef f2 71 b5] strides {76, 92, 104}
That is the variable-length type the module docs had referred to indirectly. It
is now pinned by signature and to those three strides exactly.
The 4-byte alignment is a result, not an artefact. A stride recovered from one
chunk's first-to-second record delta can inherit alignment from where that chunk
happened to sit; collecting all 55 strides across every type and requiring all
of them to be divisible by 4 rules that out, because a single off-by-one in one
signature would show. Asserted in
chunk_record_stride_is_four_byte_aligned_and_uniform_per_signature.
What this settles is the shape the decoder must handle: uniform stride per type,
4-byte aligned, one named exception. Field offsets within a record are now the
same for every record of a type, which is what makes per-type decoding
tractable. The fields themselves are still unnamed.
A layout that did NOT generalise, recorded so it is not rediscovered:
signature [53 c4 6c d7 9a 43], stride 108, 810 records, 63 of 108 byte positions
constant -- 48 bytes varying, then 60 bytes that are zero in every record, then a
constant 0x00010000. That reads like an inline buffer this type never uses, and
would have made a tidy field story. Requiring `stride == live span + zero run`
across every type with 50+ records per chunk gives 0 of 9. The zero tail belongs
to that one type and means nothing general.
Third occurrence of one editing mistake, and it is worth naming as a habit
rather than an accident: inserting a test before an existing one strands that
test's #[test] attribute on the new doc comment and silently unregisters it.
It has now happened three times, each time surfacing only as clippy's "never
used" and never as a missing test. Fixed by appending new tests at the end of
the file instead of anchoring them to an existing function, and verified by
listing registered tests rather than trusting a count.
241 tests, clippy clean, all five recent tests confirmed registered.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
040386c0fb |
Volumes: the reference that did not generalise
Last commit said what would settle the volume candidate and implied one of those
was available. They are not. Recording the failure rather than moving on quietly.
Level 0's data.bin -- the level's file descriptor -- contains the value 799204
exactly once, at 0xab6360, and 799204 is byte-for-byte the offset of the 20-record
144-byte candidate table. A single 4-byte match in 13.3 MB has a chance
expectation of ~0.003, so it was worth checking rather than assuming.
It does not hold up. Each level's own best 144-byte table, searched in that same
level's own data.bin:
level candidate records refs (chance ~0.0035)
0 1,810,724 32 0
1 1,884,884 386 0
2 2,066,804 224 0
3 2,438,228 365 0
4 2,677,780 114 0
5 1,255,780 14 0
6 2,496,020 115 0
7 2,062,072 311 0
None. The level 0 hit at 0xab6360 also sits among high-entropy neighbours, and
level 0's own BEST table -- a different offset, 32 records, not the 20-record one
-- is not referenced either. So the hit does not generalise and is most likely
coincidence.
This retracts what the previous commit implied. Nothing links a 144-byte float
table to volumes: the table is reached by walking structure rather than by an
explicit pointer, so the discriminator I named does not exist, and the candidate
stands exactly where it did.
Recording the three routes that would actually settle it, all of them
unavailable: the game's own volume code (same dead end as the collision anchor
-- a GP-relative string search returns nothing); ground truth, such as a count of
level 0's trigger volumes from a map; or a correlation with a named class, since
gameplay.bin resolves ids through its dispatch records -- but no class name
containing "volume" exists on the disc, which is exactly why this is unavailable.
No test added, because there is no solid claim here to assert. 240 tests,
unchanged.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
ca277a0a01 |
Volumes: a candidate table found, explicitly not called volumes
Volumes were the only type never located, so this is a search report rather than
a result, and it is recorded as a candidate on purpose.
Ruled out first: no engine-side name exists. No level file contains "Volume"
outside UI text ("Music volume", "Volume de la musique") and Italian item
descriptions. The format cannot be found by label and has to be structural.
gameplay.bin is already-decompressed level data. Its head is a count (336 on
level 0) then 16-byte records from byte 416, carrying (type, pad, offset, id).
The id groups them -- each id has exactly two records pointing into two parallel
offset arrays -- and those offsets resolve into a text pool, the first ones
landing mid-string in dialogue ("it Megacorp Lab"). So that part of the file is
dialogue and class dispatch, not geometry.
The structural hit: a table of 144-byte float records. Level 0 has one at
799204, 20 records of which 19 are populated and one is an all-zero terminator,
with 34-35 of each record's 36 float slots world-plausible and +0x0c holding a
varying world position:
(206.5, 284.1, 116.0) (265.0, 445.3, 131.7) (244.0, 407.2, 128.0)
(219.3, 247.0, 107.5) (185.1, 282.6, 104.9) (260.8, 423.6, 130.9)
(248.2, 198.4, 51.8) (185.8, 282.7, 102.6) (247.0, 211.5, 100.6)
A 144-byte record with world positions and float radii is the shape a volume
trigger region should have, and a matching table is present in every level
examined (0-9), each preceded by an all-zero record, counts 23 to 612.
It is NOT called volumes. Nothing ties this table to volumes. Camera bounds,
spawn points and path nodes would present exactly the same thing: float records,
world coordinates, no label. The discriminating evidence has not been gathered,
and writing "volumes" in the roadmap because the shape fits would be the exact
error this log keeps catching.
Two detector bugs, both mine, both confident before they were caught:
1. The validity test accepted zero as a world-plausible float, so every
zero-filled region scored perfectly and the cross-level check returned runs of
225 to 1,514 records that were obviously padding. Requiring non-zero floats
(>=20 of 36) separated real tables from memory immediately.
2. The 144-byte stride came from four offsets I eyeballed as being 144 apart.
Gap 144 was not in the top eight gaps of the detector that found them -- it
survived because three consecutive observations agreed, not because the
measurement supported it. The corrected detector then found much longer runs,
which is the opposite of what the eyeball version implied.
Same shape as every other correction here: a clean small plausible number read as
conclusive because nothing was checked against a control that could disagree.
To actually settle it, the table needs to be correlated with something known --
if a count matches a level's visible trigger regions, or if an id in the record
resolves through the class table to a named object, that is the discriminator.
Until then volumes remain open and the roadmap says so.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
28ab7e094b |
SBlk head characterised: four constants and one word that is not a count
sound_bank's head was parsed but never characterised. Across all 27 levels the
SBlk region opens identically for its first twelve bytes:
+0x00 "SBlk" +0x04 1 +0x08 4 +0x0c "DAW\0" +0x10 0
and +0x14 is the only word that varies. It varies with its low sixteen bits zero
on all 27, leaving 0x0092..0x0103 -- 146 to 259.
That is the shape of a record count, and it tracks the body length at close to
100 bytes per unit. It is not one:
body / field_14 91.2 .. 110.8 across 27 levels
any stride 0..80 with body = stride*word + constant exactly: no
So the test asserts the negative too. If a stride ever makes the relation exact
on all 27, sound_bank_sblk_head_is_constant_apart_from_one_word fails and asks
for the record size to be revisited. A near-miss at 100 bytes/record is exactly
what hardens into a name the next time somebody glances at it; the constants are
also checked individually so a real deviation names which one moved.
The DAW region begins with sixteen zero bytes then block-structured data with
16-byte periodicity and slowly varying nibbles -- consistent with block
compressed audio, not decoded. Recorded as such.
Two mistakes, both mine, both the same shape as earlier ones:
1. The constructor bound `format_tag` with a `let` BEFORE the two words that
precede it in the file, consuming bytes 4..8 and shifting every field after
it. The struct literal listed the names in the right order; the statements did
not. A scratch script reading the same bytes gave the opposite answer, which
is what exposed it. Fixed, with a comment, because "read the lets in file
order" gets undone otherwise.
2. Inserting the new test ahead of an existing one stranded that test's #[test]
on my doc comment -- silently unregistering
tie_vertex_element_is_16_bytes_with_fixed_texcoords. This is the SAME mistake
as two commits ago and I made it again. It again surfaced only as clippy's
"never used" rather than as a missing test. Restored and verified by listing
the registered tests rather than trusting the count.
240 tests, clippy clean, both tie vertex tests confirmed present.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
bc5ebe559f |
Tie slots 3, 6, 7: two readings excluded, and why the LOD test stops working
Having established that i16[0..2] are positions, ran the same LOD-overlap method
across all eight slots to see whether it discriminates elsewhere. It does not,
and that is worth recording before someone reads the passing numbers as nine
confirmations:
slot same class control ratio
i16[0] 97.0% 3.0% 32x
i16[1] 96.7% 3.2% 30x
i16[2] 96.4% 6.0% 16x
i16[3] 75.3% 78.7% 1x
i16[4..7] 68-91% 52-79% 1x
Only i16[0..2] carry signal, because they are the only slots with tens of
thousands of distinct values. The rest draw from sets of 226 to 1,759 values, so
any two sets of that size overlap heavily regardless of what the field means. A
passing result from a method that has run out of discriminative power is not a
passing result.
Slot 3 excluded as a skin/joint index. It holds 201 values in 0..=254 and 50
distinct values within a single draw packet, so it is per-vertex, not per-material
-- which invites the obvious reading, since tie objects are skinned. Wrong:
mean pairwise distance, same slot-3 value 14,481
mean pairwise distance, different slot-3 value 13,795
ratio 0.95x
control: same position-x bucket 8,105
Vertices sharing a slot-3 value are marginally FARTHER apart than vertices
differing in it. The control halves the distance, so the measurement works; the
0.95x is on the wrong side of neutral, though by too little to claim much on its
own. Combined with no LOD sharing (75.3% against a 78.7% control), slot 3 is
per-vertex, uncorrelated with the geometry it sits in and with the detail level.
Recorded as not understood. A per-vertex animation phase fits the arithmetic and
is labelled a guess rather than offered as a reading.
Slots 6 and 7 are mostly not per-vertex. Distinct values per draw packet, median
over 1,804 records:
i16[0..2] 13-17 constant for the whole packet 0%
i16[4,5] 6, 4 0%
i16[6] 2 43%
i16[7] 4 34%
They take a single value across an entire packet in well over a third of records,
which matches the 91.8%/88.9% dominance of 4096 and 0. Unnamed.
So the tie element is: position, byte-sized index, texcoords, layout tag, and two
slots characterised but not named. Positions, texcoord placement, element size and
the layout selector are all asserted; the remaining three are not, and the reasons
they are not are now written down rather than left as silence.
On "is Phase 2 nearly done": 40 items closed, 9 open. The nine are the hard
ones -- collision cells blocked on the game's own code, volumes not located at
all, moby_anim ruled out but unexplained, chunk record fields unnamed. Progress
on the checklist is real but the remainder is not the easy tail.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
e86de3c73e |
Tie i16[0..2] are the vertex positions, with a control in the test
The three slots ahead of the index were "unproven position" for want of a test
that could fail. One is available on the disc alone, with the control built in.
LOD 1 and LOD 2 of a tie class are the same object at two levels of detail, so
anything that locates a vertex in that object's own geometry is shared between
the two blocks; a different class' LOD is an unrelated object. Intersecting the
sets of i16[0..2] triples both ways turns "is this a position" into a
measurement. Levels 0-5, ordinary-layout elements only:
same class, LOD1 vs LOD2 96.1% 107 classes, 107 nonzero
different class, control 0.4% 2,144 pairs
A factor of 240. Per level the same-class figure runs 94.4 / 97.9 / 98.1 / 96.7 /
96.8 for levels 0-4. The control stays under 1.0% except for one level-1 pair at
45.9% -- two classes sharing most of their geometry, which is what duplicate or
variant models should look like. Reported, not excluded, and the assertion is on
the mean rather than the max so it does not have to be.
Asserted in tie_vertex_slots_0_to_2_are_shared_positions, including the ratio
(same > 20 * diff) so a change that collapsed both numbers fails rather than
passing twice, and a nonzero-overlap check so no class can silently stop
agreeing with itself.
What this rules out is the point. An index, a handle or a per-vertex counter
would not be shared at 96% between two independently built LOD meshes, nor sit at
0.4% between two objects. With 10.7k-13.2k distinct values per slot over the
full i16 range, these are positions in the object's own frame. Scale and axis
order stay unnamed -- nothing here says centimetres, and axis order is
unconstrained because nothing here assumes one.
Two things worth recording about the process:
1. The diagnostic line printed "1.0%" for 99.4% because the format was
`{same:.1}%` with no `* 100`. The assertions compared fractions and were
always correct; only the readout was wrong. Same family as everything else in
this log -- the readout disagreeing with the claim.
2. Inserting the new test in front of an existing one stranded that test's
#[test] on my doc comment, which silently unregistered
tie_vertex_element_is_16_bytes_with_fixed_texcoords. It showed up as
"never used" in clippy, not as a missing test. Restored; both tie vertex
tests are registered and 239 tests run.
Element layout now reads:
+0x00 i16[0] position x +0x06 u8 index 0..=254
+0x02 i16[1] position y +0x07 u8 layout tag, 0 in 93.4%
+0x04 i16[2] position z +0x08 i16[4] texcoord u
+0x0a i16[5] texcoord v +0x0c/+0x0e i16[6], i16[7] unnamed
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
06cf2fd46d |
Tie vertex slot 3 is a byte-sized index, not a coordinate
Splitting the 95,612 elements of levels 0-2 by i16[3]'s HIGH byte, which is the
layout selector:
0x00 89,341 93.4%
0x03 5,344 5.6%
144 other selector values 927 1.0%
146 selector values in all. Not a two-way switch, and the second case is not 0x01.
Inside the ordinary layout i16[3] is not a coordinate: 201 distinct values, all
within 0..=254, with 0 most common. That is an index. So the selector and the
index are not two independent halves sharing a slot -- it is one byte. The low
byte is the index, the high byte is the layout tag, and the ordinary layout never
sets the high byte. Asserted.
Nearly got this wrong twice, both times the same way, which is why they are in
the commit message:
1. The first pass gated the range on `w >= 0` instead of on `(w >> 8) == 0`,
letting in the other layouts' large positive values. That reported "564
distinct values in 0..=32664" -- a number that looks exactly like a
coordinate and is really two populations unioned. The selector byte is the
filter. The filter is part of the claim.
2. Two constants were guessed rather than measured (selector cardinality 159,
and an upper bound that ignored non-ordinary layouts) and both were wrong.
The cardinality is 146. Guessing a constant and then asserting it is how a
measurement becomes a tautology.
Quantified the i16[6]/i16[7] question while I was in here, because "both are
multiples of 4096" has been sitting in the docs as a fixed-point signal:
both %4096==0 in 86.5% of elements
expected if the two residues were independent: 84.3%
enrichment 1.0x -- exactly chance
They look like a fixed-point pair only because their dominant values, 4096 and 0,
are both multiples of 4096. Remove the constants and it is gone: of the 7,316
elements where i16[6] differs from 4096, only 36.7% are still multiples, and of
the 9,905 where i16[7] differs from 0, ONE is. The disc test had already refused
to call that pair a texcoord for this reason; now the reason is a number.
Remaining slots in the ordinary layout, recorded: i16[0..2] read as position but
are unproven (10.7k-13.2k distinct each, full i16 range), i16[4]/i16[5] are the
texcoords, i16[6]/i16[7] unnamed.
Also fixes two clippy map_or lints and an import that a stray --fix had broken.
238 tests, clippy clean.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
1fa1913e38 |
Reconcile the docs after the last three corrections
The last three commits changed things the documentation still asserted in the
old direction. Fixed:
roadmap
* 227 tests -> 238.
* The level_overlay bullet contradicted itself: it said "the header words are
not named" in the same breath as "+0x00 load base is 0x1A7C80". Now says
+0x00 IS the load base and is named, +0x0c is excluded as the .lit size by
sign (below file length on 16/27, by up to 8.9%) and remains unnamed, and the
unnamed remainder is stated as such.
* Section names aligned with the Phase 3 list (lvl.vtbl, lvl.camvtbl,
lvl.sndvtbl).
core-data-regions.md
* The claim-assertion audit still said the two PCSX2 claims were "NOT
assertable here -- needs a savestate". They are asserted now, gated on
GC_SSTATE, in the same file. Updated, with the two corrections that fell out
of writing them recorded right there.
* "that string is inside the collision routine" was never established. It is
in the string pool, yes; the reference to it is not found. Reworded to say
so, including the zero-hit result.
research log
* field_00 now carries its name and the .lit/$gp/program context.
* The field_0c falsification and the byte-order retraction are both recorded
here as well, so the log and the format file agree.
Nothing left asserting the withdrawn anchor, and no stale test counts.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
282e633a7c |
Withdraw the collision anchor: it was a byte-order bug in my own search
Last commit claimed exactly one GP-relative occurrence of the collision assert
string's $lo half, at 0x354cc8, and called it an unambiguous anchor. That was
wrong, and building the disassembler is what proved it.
The search compared word bytes 1..3 against the 16-bit immediate. The PS2's MIPS
is little-endian, so an I-type immediate sits in bits 15..0 -- word bytes 0 and
1. Bytes 1..3 are the opcode, $rs and $rt fields. The match was on those.
The instruction at the phantom hit is 0x24a89948:
addiu $t0, $a1, -0x66b8
whose real immediate is 0x9948 -- ten bytes from the 0x99a8 being searched for.
-0x66b8 merely looks like a plausible $gp offset, which is what made it
convincing. With the byte order corrected the count is ZERO, in 2,751,268 bytes.
So the anchor is not established and the assertion is withdrawn. What survives is
still worth having: the functions are named (Camera_CollPrimTest takes (prim,
grid)), $gp = 0x1AEFF0, .lit loads at 0x1A7C80, and the assert string is a unique
copy at overlay+0xd18.
Probably the code reaching that string does not address it through $gp, or
reaches a copy in another section. The decomp's assert-message-names.tsv gives
0x002db350 for level 0 -- inside .lit, but it disassembles to a function epilogue
(jr $ra / addiu $sp, $sp, 0x70), so those are code locations, not string
addresses, and they are not traced to the assert either.
tools/overlay-anchors now does the search with the correct byte order and
carries a comment on exactly the part that was wrong, because that is the part
that will be re-derived otherwise. It also disassembles around an address:
cargo run -q -p gc-overlay-anchors -- <overlay.bin> --disasm 0x2db350 0 64
The useful general lesson, which the roadmap already says and this is a second
demonstration of: a probe that returns a small, clean, narratively satisfying
number is the most dangerous kind of wrong result. "Exactly one hit in 2.75 MB"
read as conclusive. It was an artifact of comparing the wrong two bytes, and it
survived a commit because it fit the story.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
1f903efe23 |
An external decomp turns two overlay constants from measured into named
OpenRAC/rac2-gc-decomp is the same disc as ours, verified rather than assumed:
ours 3,828,350,976 9db2e33e...b1ce5
theirs 3,828,350,976 9db2e33e...b1ce5
Vendored read-only under vendor/ (already gitignored) and added to PROVENANCE.
It names two constants this parser had measured but never explained:
* overlay.bin +0x00 = 1,735,808 = 0x1A7C80, the .lit load base. It is constant
across all 27 levels because every level's literal section loads at the same
address. So the first header word is the load base of the section the file IS,
which also establishes that overlay.bin is that section -- it holds both code
and the debug string pool. $gp = 0x1AEFF0 comes with it, and that closes the
roadmap's open "$gp for this game" item.
The program around it is seven sections -- .lit .bss .data vtbl camvtbl sndvtbl
.text -- which is precisely the "seven-section parser and relocation" Phase 3
item for this format. Known target now rather than a guess.
I then tested the obvious follow-up and it is wrong: if +0x00 is the .lit load
base, +0x0c ought to be the .lit size. It is SMALLER than the file on 16 of 27
levels, by up to 8.9% (level11: file 3,151,128 vs 2,870,792). Excluded by sign,
not by a near miss. Still unnamed.
Collision: still blocked, but no longer blocked on tooling. The decomp names
Camera_CollPrimTest(void *prim, void *grid) without decompiling it, so the cell
layout is not handed over. What it does supply is $gp, and that is enough to
start. "Camera_CollPrimTest WARNING! - grid out of bounds! (RAR)" is at
overlay+0xd18, the only copy in the file, so:
string overlay+0xd18 -> RAM 0x1a8998; delta to $gp -0x6658; $lo 0x99a8
MIPS puts the $lo half in bytes 1..3 of a 4-byte instruction. Searching the whole
overlay instruction-aligned gives exactly ONE hit:
0x354cc8 (overlay+0x1ad048)
One occurrence in 2.75 MB of code is unambiguous: that is the instruction
materialising the assert string, and its enclosing function is
Camera_CollPrimTest. That is the route in, and it needs no symbols.
tools/overlay-anchors does this step, dependency-free. I started this with
capstone for the disassembly proper and dropped it: capstone 0.14 does not
re-export Mode/Endian from a public path, and an excluded-from-the-workspace
native dependency is a poor trade for a step that does not need one yet. The
anchor search is pure byte work, so it is pure Rust. No native dependency is
added anywhere, and the tool is an ordinary workspace member.
Surveyed the rest of that project against our open items: no volume structures,
no tie vertex layouts, no SBlk/DAW fields, no wavelet tables. It is a guide to
the code, not a replacement for reading it.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
26a0918178 |
Gate the PCSX2 claims as tests; two corrections fall out of writing them
The audit two commits ago listed three claims as "not assertable here -- needs a
savestate". With PCSX2 running they are assertable, so they now are. gc-trace
already exposed gc_trace::Savestate::ee_ram_owned(); gc-extract just needed it as
a dev-dependency. Both tests are gated on GC_SSTATE and skip cleanly without it,
so a normal checkout pays nothing.
Writing them corrected two claims, which is the main reason they were worth
writing as tests rather than staying prose.
1. The collision payload is NOT "byte-for-byte identical". The original claim
rested on a 4 KiB probe; the test compares the whole 903,248-byte payload:
payload 903,248 bytes at RAM 0xac6800
first difference +0xdc82c, i.e. 903,212 bytes in
bytes that differ 6 (0.00%)
903,212 of 903,248 bytes are verbatim and 6 are not, all in the final 36.
"Verbatim" was an overclaim on a probe that never looked at the tail. The test
now measures the whole payload and reports the extent, asserting only that the
divergence is beyond the head.
2. The tfrag relocation base is the TABLE address, not the block base. The delta is
8,683,584 = 0x848040 = block base 0x848000 plus table_offset 0x40 -- which is
exactly what TfragHeader::data's own documentation says, "relative to the
table". The earlier claim said "the block's RAM base", off by exactly the table
offset.
Also: +0x10 and +0x38 do NOT share one constant. The aggregate "1,665 fields
relocate by one constant" was true only because +0x10 carried it; lumping them
hid that. The test asserts +0x10 and REPORTS +0x38's delta rather than assuming.
The patch-rewrite figures also restated on aggregate rather than median, which is
why they read lower than the 7.80%/8.12% medians recorded earlier:
patch bytes rewritten -- cannot morph 1.9% of 334, can morph 2.1% of 499
Same conclusion, stated on a total instead of a per-patch median, and asserted to
within 3 percentage points of each other.
Net: the audit table in docs/formats/core-data-regions.md now has no "prose only"
rows for disc-or-savestate-readable claims.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
9f938f47de |
Assert the tie vertex layout finding in a test, and audit which claims are asserted
The i16[3] high-byte finding -- the most recent and most subtle result of this stretch, and the one I corrected twice -- lived only in prose. Two commits is exactly how long a claim can sit unasserted before it drifts. It now has a test: tie_vertex_layout_is_selected_by_i16_3_high_byte which reproduces the figures exactly and, importantly, asserts both directions: (4,5) and (6,7) are above 0.85 and 0.80 in the ordinary group, (6,7) is BELOW 0.99 so it cannot silently become the constant I once mistook it for, (0,1) and (2,3) are under 0.20, and every pair in the non-zero group is under 0.15. A future change in either layout now fails loudly. Also audited the rest of this session's claims against the test suite and recorded the result in the format doc: tie vertex element is 16 bytes asserted layout selected by i16[3] HIGH byte asserted (this commit) blocks self-delimiting on 0xf6 asserted per-block packets == 0 means no block at that LOD asserted packets[0] == 256 on 1,864 of 1,864 asserted chunk record length uniform per chunk asserted moby class IDs in one body slot per type asserted collision payload verbatim in RAM NOT assertable here -- needs a savestate tfrag patch bytes all rewritten by LOD same morphing is unobservable in that image same The split is deliberate: disc-readable claims are asserted against the disc, savestate-dependent ones live in plan/pcsx2-verification.md with their method. What is not acceptable is a disc-readable claim living only in prose -- which is how the tie i16[3] finding spent two commits before it had a test, and how several older claims drifted before the roadmap reconciliation caught them. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
922248a4ec |
Tie: the element layout differs by i16[3] high byte, and (6,7) is a real pair
Two results, one of them a correction.
1. "(6,7) is just the constant 4096/0 pair, not a texcoord" -- wrong. It looked
like an artifact because a constant is trivially a pair of multiples of 4096.
But partitioned by i16[3]'s high byte it is a genuine fixed-point pair in its
own right:
i16[3] high byte ZERO (n = 89,341) divisor rate by slot pair
pair /1 /4 /16 /256
( 0, 1) 100.0% 11.5% 4.6% 3.3% baseline
( 2, 3) 100.0% 11.0% 4.5% 3.3% baseline
( 4, 5) 100.0% 92.9% 92.0% 91.8% the texcoords
( 6, 7) 100.0% 89.5% 87.3% 86.5% a SECOND fixed-point pair
If (6,7) were a constant it would score 100%, not 89.5%. The constant is the
common case WITHIN it, not the whole of it -- which is exactly the distinction
the constant-artifact lesson is about, and I applied it backwards last time.
So the ordinary element carries TWO fixed-point pairs, (4,5) and (6,7), with
(0,1) and (2,3) at baseline. What (6,7)'s role is remains open -- second UV
set, normal, or a zero-heavy fixed-point pair all fit.
2. The element LAYOUT differs between the three cases. Scoring all four slot
pairs within the non-zero high-byte group, no pair stands out:
i16[3] high byte NON-ZERO (n = 6,271)
pair /1 /4 /16 /256
( 0, 1) 100.0% 4.6% 3.5% 0.7%
( 2, 3) 100.0% 2.0% 0.6% 0.0%
( 4, 5) 100.0% 1.9% 0.3% 0.1%
( 6, 7) 100.0% 7.5% 5.7% 4.5%
Best is 7.5% against a 2-5% baseline. So for those 6,271 vertices the 16 bytes
are not laid out as position/texcoord/normal at all -- a different element
shape, selected by the high byte.
This also explains why the global slot-pair score looked ambiguous to begin with:
pooling the two layouts averages a 92% pair and a 7% pair into one number that
describes neither. Fourth time this session that partitioning produced the answer
rather than merely bounding it.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
ed3e85a0f2 |
Refine the tie texcoord finding: it is i16[3]'s HIGH byte that selects
The previous commit said i16[3] selects the texcoord encoding. That was right but loose -- it is specifically the HIGH BYTE, and the low byte is a separate thing. Grouped by the high byte across the same 95,612 vertices on levels 0-2: i16[3] high byte n % / 16 % / 256 0x00 89,341 92.0% 91.8% 0x03 5,344 0.0% 0.0% 0x04 71 0.0% 0.0% 0x40 58 5.2% 0.0% 0x02 47 2.1% 2.1% 0x19, 0x05, 0x20, ... the remaining 73 A high byte of zero is the ordinary case -- 89,341 of 95,612, 93.4% -- at 92%. EVERY other high byte scores at or near zero. The split is on the byte, not on the value: i16[3] of 1 and of 771 differ only in the high byte and behave completely differently. Within the all-zero case there is a third distribution: i16[3] == 0 exactly (5,851 vertices) scores 62% at 16 and 61% at 256, against 92% for 1..255. So three cases, selected by the high byte and then the low: high 0x00, low 0x00 5,851 a third distribution, 62% at 1/16 high 0x00, low 1..255 83,490 the ordinary case, 92% at 1/4096 high non-zero 6,271 0%, an encoding this reading does not see The 6,271 matches the figure quoted last commit for "vertices using an encoding this reading does not see", and the two group counts sum consistently with the committed test's 95,612 -- so this refines the finding rather than changing it. A measurement trap worth recording: the all-zero case is a SUBSET of high byte 0x00, so summing the per-high-byte groups double-counts it. An intermediate total came out at 100,792 against the true 94,941 for those groups; the committed test's figure is the one to trust. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
e27c40e738 |
Explain the tie texcoord residual: i16[3] selects the encoding
The texcoords are 12-bit fixed on 82.5% of vertices, not 100%, and the residual had no explanation. Grouped by the vertex's i16[3] slot across 95,612 vertices on levels 0-2, the buckets separate completely: i16[3] n % / 4096 % / 256 negative 333 1.2% 1.2% == 0 5,851 29.2% 60.7% 1..63 28,884 92.7% 94.3% 64..255 54,606 92.3% 93.8% 256..511 8 0.0% 0.0% 512..1023 5,391 0.0% 0.0% >= 1024 539 0.2% 0.2% The residual is fully accounted for. 87.3% of vertices sit in 1..255 at about 92.5% fixedness, contributing 0.873 * 0.925 = 80.8 points; the 5,851 at i16[3] == 0 contribute 1.8 more. That is the 82.5% measured, to the point. The remaining ~6% are not 12-bit fixed at all. i16[3] >= 256, and negatives, score 0% at BOTH 4096 and 256 -- 6,271 vertices in an encoding this reading does not see. And i16[3] == 0 scores 29.2% at 4096 but 60.7% at 256, which is a third distribution rather than a weaker version of the same one. What this establishes: i16[3] is a per-vertex packed attribute whose value SELECTS HOW the texcoord pair is stored, rather than an independent field sitting beside the texcoords. 1-255 is the ordinary case, 0 is special, 256-and-up and negatives are a different encoding. What those three cases MEAN is still open -- texture index, normal index, flag or a combination -- but it is now a field whose role is known, which is more than "packed word". Worth noting the shape of the claim this replaces: "the texcoords are 12-bit fixed at i16[4]/i16[5], 73.6% of the time, unexplained". The field position was right; the 73.6% was a population average over three encodings. Partitioning by the one variable that separates them turns a mystery into a lookup -- rule 3a again, and the third time this session that partitioning a mystery produced the answer rather than merely bounding it. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
3ee0b3d0dc |
Disprove that morphing causes the tfrag byte changes: LOD selection does
Read the whole tfrags block from RAM -- 4,379,200 bytes at 0x848000 -- and compared
every one of the 833 patches against its disc copy, grouped by whether it CAN morph:
patches with NO morphing entries 334 differing: max 10.59%, median 7.80%
patches WITH morphing entries 499 differing: max 10.49%, median 8.12%
patches 100% identical to disc 0/334 and 0/499
The two groups are indistinguishable. Morphing is NOT what changes the bytes, and
this disproofs the claim two commits ago that the 8.6% was "morphed positions with
topology and UVs left verbatim". If it were, the 334 patches with no morphing
entries would be untouched -- and none of them is.
Nor is it a pointer relocation: the differing bytes fall in short structured runs
(257-263, 272-277, 305 on patch 0) whose u32 deltas share no common value.
The explanation consistent with everything measured is that the loader REGENERATES
each patch's VU packet stream for the LOD tier it selected. That happens to every
patch, morphing or not -- and it is why morphing shows no signal.
This also settles the verification route, which the previous commit left as "needs
the camera distance at the savestate". It does not, and no camera distance would
help: this memory image shows the LOD-selected form rather than the morph state,
so there is nothing in it to solve a weight against. Verifying the derivation needs
a captured frame at a known view distance instead.
What is established now, all measured on the full population rather than inferred
from one patch:
- data and cube_ofs are relocated pointers, delta 0x848000, on all 833 records
- every patch's bytes are rewritten, ~8%, by LOD-driven packet regeneration
- morphing is not observable in this memory image
- 833 of 833 patches parse; 499 of 833 have morphing entries; 43,613 vertex-info
entries across the level
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
aff977e8c5 |
Correct the tfrag pointer-field claim, and show morphing regenerates VU packets
Two corrections to the previous commit, both from continuing the RAM comparison.
1. The previous commit said the RAM comparison "names two fields the disc-side
work had left as data and an unnamed word". It does not. +0x10 is
TfragHeader::data and +0x38 is TfragHeader::cube_ofs, both already named in the
struct. What RAM adds is that both are POINTERS -- relocated by adding the
block's RAM base -- rather than plain offsets. That is still worth knowing, but
it is not a naming.
2. The previous commit attributed the 8.6% of rewritten bytes to "morphed
positions with topology and UVs left verbatim". That is wrong, and patch 1 shows
why. Comparing 4 KiB, disc 0xdf60 against RAM 0x855f60:
bytes differing 354 of 4,096 = 8.6%
contiguous runs 120
longest run 8 bytes
extent +0xc1 through the end of the window
Patch 1 has 83 positions and 83 vertex-info entries, of which 13 morph. If
morphing rewrote position fields alone, the differing bytes would be a 13/83 slice
of a 498-byte position array -- a couple of dozen bytes in one contiguous region.
Instead 354 bytes differ, spread over 120 short runs across the whole window.
So the loader is not patching positions in place: it REGENERATES the VU packet
stream for the current morph state. That is what morphing is on this hardware --
VU1 GIF packets, not a CPU-side vertex array.
Consequence for verification, and the reason this is worth committing rather than
just noting: the plan of "map RAM vertices to disc indices and solve for the weight"
does not work against this memory image. The positions are inside regenerated
packets, so there is no stable per-vertex correspondence to read a weight out of.
Verifying the morph weight against the original needs the CAMERA DISTANCE at the
savestate, so the weight can be computed from the derivation and compared with the
rendered result, rather than read back out of RAM.
Population figures gathered on the way: 833 of 833 patches parse, carrying 43,613
vertex-info entries; 499 of 833 patches have at least one morphing entry, and
patch 0 -- the first record -- is base-only with none.
Also fixed a measurement error mid-run: I compared patch 1 at disc 0xdf60 against
RAM 0x855f00, off by 0x60, and got "every byte differs". The corrected base is
0x855f60.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
93591a79de |
Verify the tfrag record framing against RAM: two pointer fields, morphed vertices
The tfrags block header -- table_offset 0x40, tfrag_count 833, lod_distance 32.0 -- hits once in the level-0 savestate at RAM 0x848000, so disc offset 0 maps to RAM 0x848000 and the block can be compared position for position. Result 1: exactly two fields per record are rewritten. Comparing all 833 64-byte table records field by field: records compared 833 u32 fields differing 1,665 = 833 x 2, and no others their offsets +0x10 and +0x38, on every record relocation delta 8,683,584 = 0x848000, on 833 of them So +0x10 and +0x38 are block-relative pointers and the loader adds the block's RAM base to each. Every other byte of all 833 records is verbatim. Six fields differ by 0xF80000 and 0x1F00000 instead -- three records pointing into a different buffer, recorded rather than averaged. This names two fields the disc-side work had left as `data` and an unnamed word. Result 2: behind the pointers, about 8.6% of bytes are rewritten. Following record 0's +0x10 to disc 0xd040 / RAM 0x855040 and comparing 16 KiB: 14,977 bytes identical, 1,407 differ = 8.6%. The differences spread across many field positions rather than concentrating, which is what morphed POSITIONS look like -- topology, UVs, counts and command lists stay verbatim while a fraction of the position bytes move. 8.6% is about half of a 16-byte vertex's six position bytes, consistent with roughly half the vertices in this patch mid-morph at the saved camera distance. Not established: that the morphed bytes match resolve_vertex's formula. That needs mapping RAM vertices to disc vertex indices and solving for the weight, which is the next step -- but the framing is now known well enough to attempt it, and the two pointer fields are confirmed rather than inferred. This also answers the "is morphing real?" question that made the earlier tfrags probe fail to match RAM: the tfrags block is not verbatim in RAM, because both its table pointers are relocated and its vertex positions are morphed. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
6d0c1b6fd1 |
Close out tfrag on the disc side, and fix two stale "not recovered" claims
Picked tfrag morph targets from the open list and found the premise was wrong. There are no morph targets in this format. Morphing is a blend toward the midpoint of the vertex's two PARENT vertices -- g[parent1_position] and g[parent2_position] -- which are other vertices in the same tfrag. The engine implements exactly that in resolve_vertex, and it is covered by morphing_blends_toward_the_parent_midpoint plus morph_weight_runs_from_zero_to_one_across_its_band and collapse_distances_are_the_far_edge_of_each_band. So "morph targets unrecovered" was never a gap; it named a thing that does not exist in the format. Strip bookkeeping is likewise already there: TfragStrip carries vertex_count_and_flag, and tfrag_triangles walks the strip command lists and index arrays to build triangles. That was the other half of the same roadmap entry. Coverage, all passing: 36 tfrag tests, 9 texture tests, 23 gc-engine tests. The real-disc texture test decodes all 1595 level textures, with pixels and mip levels, so the module doc's "not yet recovered: the texel data the texture table points into" is also stale. Two stale claims corrected: 1. crates/gc-formats/src/tfrag.rs said "Not yet recovered: the LOD switch and morph rules in TfragProc, and the texel data the texture table points into. See docs/plan/tfrag.md." The rules are recovered and tested, the texels are decoded, and docs/plan/tfrag.md DOES NOT EXIST -- a dangling reference to a file that was never written. 2. docs/roadmap.md marked tfrag partial with "Still open: morph targets and the strip/chain bookkeeping". Neither is open. The honest replacement for both is what is genuinely not claimed: the LOD switch distances, morph weight and collapse edge are DERIVED from the data -- tiers are classified from the four V4_8 parent arrays, the weight runs zero to one across each tier's band -- but have not been checked against PCSX2 the way the lighting pass was. That is a verification gap, not a parsing gap, and it needs a frame captured at a known view distance rather than more disc-side measurement. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
d56b439502 |
Exclude the collision segmentation theories on the full population, and name the
unblock Continuing on the verbatim payload with the grid known. Cells are not zero-separated. Counting maximal runs of non-zero u16 across the whole payload: level 0 363 cells 15,115 runs mean run 25.3 u16 level 1 384 cells 24,647 runs mean run 51.5 u16 level 2 53 cells 31,512 runs mean run 30.3 u16 Two to three orders of magnitude apart, so a zero run is not a cell boundary. Cells are not uniform blocks either: level 0 averages 2,488 bytes per cell and level 2 averages 43,684, which cannot both be one fixed-size record. The run lengths are not records. Their histogram has a long tail of near-power-of-two values -- 2,140, 1,184, 840, 816, 628, 604, 562 -- which is what you get when a run is bounded by a single zero byte inside otherwise dense data, not by a delimiter. With the 18%-zeros finding, the payload reads as dense data with sparse holes rather than a delimited sequence. So all three segmentation theories are now excluded on the full population rather than on a sample: not ascending u32 tables, not zero-run delimiters, not fixed stride. What would actually unblock this: overlay.bin IS the game's own code, and the collision parser is in it. Camera_CollPrimTest WARNING! - grid out of bounds! (RAR) was located in the debug string pool earlier, and that string is inside the collision routine. So the format is recoverable -- but not by measuring bytes. It needs disassembly of that routine, or an R&C2 reference for the collision cell record. Stating that plainly is worth more than another scan. The disc-side measurement space for collision is exhausted: the bytes are available, verbatim, the grid is known, and three independent segmentation theories have failed on the whole population. Further probing without the loader's own logic will not converge. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
338af9b7bd |
Fix the collision grid dims, and disprove two sample artifacts in the payload
With the payload confirmed verbatim in RAM, the disc bytes can be read directly.
The grid dimensions are the first two u16 of the payload: level 0 is 11 x 33 =
363 cells, level 1 24 x 16 = 384, level 2 1 x 53 = 53. Level 2 being one cell wide
is worth noting -- the grids are not all similar in shape.
Two readings disproved, both by measuring the whole payload instead of a sample.
An ascending u32 offset table. A probe from payload +1024 reads f4ae0000 40af0000
c4b2000020b20000, which is three ascending values before the fourth goes down
(0xb2c4 to 0xb220). Read as a table, that was a three-value impression. Scanning
all three levels for maximal ascending u32 runs of 8 or more entries finds zero,
on every level.
A global alternating-zero stride. The head of level 0 shows an obvious (value, 0)
pattern from about i16[37]:
[32..] [1808, 1872, 2198, 0, 34, 86, 25848, 1, 25824, 1,
-13028, 0, -12284, 0, -12228, 0, -12716, 0, ...]
Measured over the whole payload, both alignments score far below what that sample
suggests: even-slot aligned 18% second-half zero, odd-slot aligned 13%. The
sample again.
What the global numbers do say is that the payload is heavily zero-bearing -- 18%
against a chance rate of about 0.0015% -- which is what a sparse or variable-length
encoding looks like, and consistent with the variable-length reading established
earlier. The 18-against-13 split is a real alignment preference but a weak one.
The cell layout is still undecoded. The useful position now is that the bytes can
be read as they are and that they are sparse and variable-length rather than
fixed-stride, so the next attempt should look for a terminator-delimited walk
through the sparse region rather than for a record size.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
d5e637930b |
Show the collision payload is verbatim in RAM, and retract the "not in RAM" claim
This overturns the premise collision work was blocked on. Searching the level-0 savestate for a probe from collision payload +1024 hits at 0xac6c00; a probe from +64 hits at 0xac6840. The difference is 0x3C0 = 960, which is exactly 1024 - 64, so the payload sits at a fixed relative address -- RAM 0xac6800 for the disc address 0x27e800 -- and reading it back is byte-for-byte the disc's own bytes: RAM 0xac6800 0b 00 21 00 b6 08 ad 08 a4 08 6b 08 38 08 63 07 disc 0x27e800 0b 00 21 00 b6 08 ad 08 a4 08 6b 08 38 08 63 07 Nothing is reshaped. That is the opposite of the tie block, where the loader relocates a pointer inside each record. The retraction. The previous note reads: "level 1's 24 x 16 grid dimensions appear in memory, level 0's 11 x 33 appear nowhere, so disc-side decoding has to work against the reshaped form." Level 0's dimensions ARE in RAM, at 0xac6800 -- 0b 00 and 21 00 are the first two bytes of the block, 11 and 33. The search that missed them looked for 0b 00 00 00 21 00 00 00, the dimensions as a pair of u32s. They are stored as two u16s, so that pattern never occurs. So the negative result was an artifact of the search pattern, not evidence about the data -- and it was then used as a premise for several rounds of disc-side work. Both lessons were already written down in AGENTS.md and both were re-learned: a negative from a byte search bounds the search, not the format; and the control here is one command -- read the predicted RAM address and compare it to the disc -- which would have shown the verbatim copy immediately. Also recorded while mapping it: the payload contains ascending u32 offset tables from +1024 onward, and its first two bytes are the grid dimensions, so level 0's grid is 11 x 33. The cell layout itself is still undecoded, but the blocker is gone: disc-side decoding no longer has to work against a reshaped form. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
180fc27b04 |
Locate the tie texcoord field at i16[4]/i16[5], and rule out the (6,7) artifact
Scoring each adjacent i16 slot pair of the 16-byte tie vertex for 12-bit fixedness over 36,501 level-0 vertices locates the fields: (i16[0], i16[1]) 1.1% not a texcoord (i16[2], i16[3]) 4.8% not a texcoord (i16[4], i16[5]) 73.6% <- the texcoords (i16[6], i16[7]) 76.6% <- the near-constant 4096/0 pair (6,7) scores HIGHER and is not a texcoord. It is the near-constant 4096, 0 pair: 4096 is 1.0 in 12-bit fixed and 0 is zero, so both are trivially multiples of 4096. That is the constant artifact again -- a fixed pair would score 100% anywhere. The field is (4,5), with (0,1) and (2,3) ruled out at 1.1% and 4.8%. The first four slots span the full i16 range with 10,803 to 13,421 distinct values each, so they are neither texcoords nor small fields. The vertex base is confirmed to be vert_ofs alone. Adding the shader or control region makes it worse -- vert_ofs only 73.6% bfc + vert_ofs 69.8% bfc + control_count*control_size + vert_ofs 66.7% -- so the 73.6% residual is not a mislocated base. Worth recording because vert_ofs (3..7) numerically overlaps the shader region (5*shader_count, 5..20 quadwords), which made a combined base look plausible; measurement says the simple one is right. The test asserts (4,5) above 60% and (0,1)/(2,3) below 5%/15%, and names the (6,7) artifact in its failure message so the higher-scoring pair cannot be mistaken for the answer later. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
35b087c882 |
Establish the tie vertex element is 16 bytes, and correct the roadmap's tie entry
With TieRecord identified as RAC1's TiePacketHeader, each record's leading word points at its packet in the block payload. Following it and stepping vert_size elements from vert_ofs reaches the vertices: 95,612 of them on levels 0-2. Element size settled by comparison, not assumed. Requiring the texcoord pair to be 12-bit fixed -- both words multiples of 4096, which is how 0x1000 = 1.0 reads: element 16 bytes : 78,919 / 95,612 = 82.5% element 8 bytes : 45,661 / 95,612 = 47.8% element 12 bytes : 44,834 / 95,612 = 44.8% Sixteen wins by a factor of 1.7 over the nearest alternative. Observed layout, 8 x i16: the first three slots span the full i16 range with 10,803-13,421 distinct values each; i16[4] and [5] are the texcoords and are both multiples of 4096 on 82.5%; i16[6] reads 4096 on 85.8% and i16[7] reads 0 on 84.0%. Not established: what any field means, and why the texcoord rate is 82.5% rather than 100%. The residual tracks record shape -- (shaders 2, control 7, size 2) hits 60%, (shaders 1, control 18, size 5) hits 89% -- so it is not one bad block but something per-packet this reading does not capture. Worth recording that this is the OPPOSITE of what the disc alone concluded two commits ago. Reading the header word at +0x00 as an element count gave 0 of 922 blocks dividing; it is the byte offset to the payload, so the table it bounds has 16-byte records. The number was right and the reading was wrong, which is what the packet-header identification corrected. The roadmap's tie entry was also stale -- it still said "a 16-byte record is withdrawn", which the packet-header work had already reversed. Rewritten from the commits: both indirections, self-delimiting blocks, the TiePacketHeader identification with its 15,219/15,219 rule, the 16-byte vertex element, and what remains open. A test asserts the element size against both alternatives so the 82.5% figure cannot be quietly replaced by an assumption. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
54862b64ee |
Identify the tie record as RAC1's TiePacketHeader, and retract a formula
The 16-byte tie record is R&C1's TiePacketHeader offset for offset: a data pointer at +0, then R&C1's byte fields at +4 through +0x10. The identification is not a resemblance but R&C1's own rule -- bfc_distance == 5 * shader_count -- holding on all 15,219 records of all 2,177 blocks on all 27 levels. Measured over the same set, and reported rather than asserted where it is not universal: bfc_distance == 5 * shader_count 15219 / 15219 vert_ofs <= vert_size all scissor_size <= scissor_ofs all control_size <= control_count all color_ofs == vert_size 12640 / 15219 color_ofs == vert_ofs + vert_size 0 / 15219 color_count, strip_count, strip_vertex_count zero 15089 / 15077 / 15078 R&C1's rule for the colour offset holding on none of them is the interesting line: the two games use that field differently, so it is named color_ofs for what this game's majority reads as and the 2,579 exceptions are counted rather than averaged away. TieRecord parses all twelve fields, invariants_hold asserts only the universal four, and the disc test counts the rest. A packet-length formula is withdrawn rather than softened. (vert_ofs + vert_size + scissor_ofs + scissor_size) * 16 was measured at 61 of 61 pairs and is not reproduced on the correct blocks -- 0 of 13,042. The block set was the error, not the arithmetic: the script that produced the 61 read packets[2] where packets[1] was meant, so it measured 461 blocks instead of the 2,177 the class tables define, and the formula agreed perfectly with a population that was not the tie blocks. TieRecord::packet_bytes goes with it, and the retraction is recorded in the format doc and in the struct. That misread also explains why the earlier RAM verification saw different numbers for the two inputs -- same lesson as rule 3, arriving through a wrong subscript instead of a wrong span. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
4e90c282ad |
Make the tie record relocation a command, and verify it on two levels
The relocation rule from the previous commit was established by a script that lived in a shell history, which means the next person would have had to rediscover it. It is now `gc-trace verify-tie-records <unpacked-dir> <level> <class> <lod> <src>`: resolve the class, parse the block, search the RAM image for the loaded record table, report what it found, and exit 0 only when every record's pointer has become table + word and every field byte is verbatim. Swept over every (class, lod) slot of two levels, from PCSX2 savestates: level 0: 87 slots with a block, 87 verified, 0 mismatched, 61 absent level 1: 104 slots with a block, 104 verified, 0 mismatched, 78 absent So the rule holds on every LOD block of two levels the game had loaded, which is what makes the record layout a finding rather than a reading of one block. Writing the command also caught an off-by-one in the parser it exercises: TieBlockHeader::records started its slice after the 16-byte header, but the header IS the first record -- the table runs from the block start to data_offset, and a block with data_offset 0x50 holds five records, the first being the header itself and its pointer naming where the payload begins. Found because the tool's first run relocated nothing while the same check in a script had passed; the unit test fixture was wrong in the same way and is fixed. Two operational notes now in the format doc: the live emulator is not a stable input (verifying level 1 over PINE matched 104 of 104 while the user was on that planet, and the same command minutes later found no matching copy because they had returned to level 0 -- a miss there is not a counterexample, so the report says "no copy matched" rather than "failed"), and a class index past the table count is an error rather than a mismatch, so a sweep should stop at the level's class count rather than a round number. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
e6eecb871f |
Decode the tie LOD block: it is a table of 16-byte records
The tie block's word at +0x00 was read as an element count, and the reading failed in a way worth recording: the payload length divided by it is a whole number on 0 of 922 blocks, at any record size and any header up to 512 bytes. That is the correct measurement of the wrong hypothesis -- the word never described the payload. Range measured: every LOD block of level 1 whose word is a non-zero multiple of 16, plus the two read by hand in full. Method: locate each block's record table in PCSX2's RAM by its twelve field bytes, which are the only distinctive 12-byte run in a block, then compare every record against its disc copy. Each block has several copies in RAM, and the one that matches is the loaded one -- checking the first hit is what made the first attempt report 0 of 16. Result: on 16 of 16 blocks, every record's leading word has become table_address + word, and the other twelve bytes are byte-identical to the disc. So a block is [16-byte header][record table][vertex payload], the records are 16 bytes -- a leading u32 pointer plus twelve bytes of fields -- and the header's word at +0x00 is the byte offset from the block start to the payload, that is, the length of the table. That is what the multiple-of-16 was: the table holds 16-byte records. It is never zero because there is always at least the first record, and its 42 distinct values are table lengths. Each record's pointer is relative to the table start, relocated at load to table + word. TieBlockHeader::data_offset and TieBlockHeader::records carry it, bound by the offset, with TieRecord for the twelve field bytes, and the disc test asserts the table is bounded on every block. What the records' fields name and what the payload holds are still open -- the payload is known to be variable-length, float-shaped, not LZ77 and not VIF1. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
c2af0528e3 |
Correct the chunk loader finding and decode a record field
The loader note said every record gains a 02 00 prefix in RAM. It does not: the word is the record's own leading field, already on the disc at every record. What the loader changes is the pointer -- it addresses the word, two bytes earlier than the disc's table -- and that pointer shift is what made the bytes look inserted. Measured, in order: - the two bytes before a payload are identical in core_data and in RAM, record for record: 02 00 on level 0's 90-record chunk at 0x100b302, 08 00 on the level's first chunk. Nothing is inserted; - the RAM table's low 24 bits are the payload's minus 2, consistently, so the record is [leading u16][two index bytes][payload] and the loaded table addresses the leading word. That is also why the index bytes read as +2 from the pointer -- the same +2 the earlier RAM result quotes; - the word is a field, not a pad: uniform across a chunk's records on 1,439 of 1,509 chunks (None on the 70 that vary, reported rather than averaged), fixed within all 71 chunk types, and only ever 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10 -- 554 chunks carry 2, 520 carry 4. Two readings of the value were measured and disproved, so they are recorded as disproved rather than left as candidates: it is not an entry count (the payload divided by it leaves 57 distinct fractional "sizes", and 162 chunks do not divide at all), and it is not the number of distinct leading bytes (agrees on 0 of 1,506 chunks). Chunk gains `prefix: Option<u16>`, and the disc test asserts the uniformity, the per-type fixity and the value set. The scratch example that produced the per-type class-ID table is dropped now that the same scan is a committed test, which also lands here: moby class IDs sit in one body slot per chunk type, with the slot varying by type and the distinct >= 4 filter load-bearing -- without it the top slots are constants that read as 305x because any value below the moby count counts as a hit. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
8147110377 |
Bring the roadmap's chunk section up to date
Four commits of chunk work -- uniform record length, the leading-byte phase counter, the two-byte record index, and the PCSX2 RAM findings -- were written to docs/formats/core-data-regions.md and docs/plan/pcsx2-verification.md but never reached the roadmap, because the scripted replacements kept missing their target text and I did not check that they had applied. That is the staleness complained about earlier recurring through a different route: not a missing edit, but a silently-failed one. The tie, collision and level_overlay entries had landed; only the chunk ones had not. Rewritten from the commits rather than from memory, and the numbers are the ones the tests assert: 1,509 chunks, 34,491 records, uniform length 1,509/1,509, phase counter 1,262/1,509, index rule 1,235/1,509, RAM prefix 02 00 on 90/90. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
2c4bbdc600 |
Use PCSX2 RAM to recover the chunk loader's transformation
This is what RAM was needed for: nothing about the loader's transformation is recoverable from the disc. Anchor: a 32-byte probe from inside a chunk record in level 0's core_data, searched in the level-0 savestate. It hits at 0x18538a8 and the record's first bytes at 0x185387e -- exactly chunk_base + record_offset, no rescaling. So the chunk payload is copied VERBATIM; unlike collision and the shrub packet tables it is not expanded or repacked. Result 1: the offset table is rewritten to absolute EE addresses. disc: f000057c f00006b0 f00007e4 f0000914 RAM: 0xf185387c 0xf18539b0 0xf1853ae4 0xf1853c14 The 0xf0000000|low24 tag becomes 0xf1850000|low24 -- tag replaced by the chunk's load base, low 24 bits untouched. Consecutive deltas agree exactly (0x134, 0x134, 0x130), which is why the disc-side stride is approximate rather than constant. Result 2: every record gains a constant 2-byte prefix 02 00, and the rewritten table points at THAT rather than at the record data. Walking all 90 records from the RAM dump: prefix 02 00 on 90 of 90; the disc's index bytes preserved unchanged at +2/+3 on 90 of 90. Result 3, the useful one: the byte at +2 takes exactly 0, 16, 32, ... 240 -- the 16 values index_rule predicts for step = 16, phase = 0. The mixed-radix record index derived from the disc is corroborated on the running game's own copy of the chunk. That is a disc-derived claim validated against the game, which is the strongest form of check available here. On disc a chunk is [16-byte header][10 zero bytes][tagged offset table][records]. In RAM it is [16-byte header][10 zero bytes][absolute-pointer table][records each prefixed with 02 00]. The 02 00 is unexplained -- possibly a record type or an alignment the loader needs -- but it is constant, so like the two index bytes it carries no per-record information. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
e2b12a2e52 |
Rule out a count field in chunk record bodies; correct a six-record impression
With the record framing settled (leading two bytes = record index), the body is bytes 2..len. Four probes, mostly negative, recorded so the next attempt does not repeat them. No count field. For every chunk type, every u16 and u32 position in the first 64 body bytes, at element strides 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16: does the stored value equal (record_len - offset) / stride on 90%+ of records? No type produced a hit. The record does not carry an element count near its head. The body is dense, not float-dominated. For the largest type (2430 records, 326-byte bodies): f32 reads within +/-5000 of origin 74%, uniform-random control 49%, zero-byte fraction 13%. Above baseline but far short of the tie blocks (53-64% against 16%, with 43% zero bytes). There is an index-like region near the tail. In the largest type, 12 of 163 u16 slots have a maximum below 0x1000 -- too small for float or half-float, so those look like indices or small counts -- clustered at slots 111-121 and 130-131. A sample-size correction. Dumping six records of one chunk showed slots 112-119 zero on every record plus a long run of other constants, which reads as "the record is mostly a per-chunk template". Measured across the 1,171 chunks with at least 8 records: 15,422 of 164,390 u16 slots are constant across their chunk, 9.4%, and 0 of 1,171 chunks are entirely constant. So 9.4%, and no chunk is a template. Six records looked like a majority because that chunk's tail carries shared constants. Per type the figure ranges from 9.4% overall to 55.6% on one type, so it is reported per type as well as pooled -- the pooled figure alone would hide that spread, which is the same trap rule 3a describes. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
28680b4be3 |
Show the first two chunk-record bytes encode the record's own index
Continuing from the phase counter. Within a chunk: i : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15 16 17 ... byte0: 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 ... 240 0 16 32 byte1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 1 1 1 byte0 is step*(j mod g) and byte1 is (j / g), where g = 256/step and j = index + phase. The pair is the record's index in mixed radix: byte0 carries the low digits scaled by step, byte1 the quotient. Measured over all 27 levels: 1,235 of 1,509 chunks fit this on both bytes. Byte 0 alone fits 1,262, so the 27-chunk difference are chunks whose first byte follows the rule and whose second does not. On 1,235 chunks a record knows its own position and the two leading bytes hold no per-record information. ResolvedChunk::index_rule returns the (step, phase) only when the whole chunk fits on BOTH bytes, so the 274 that do not stay distinguishable and nothing skips a leading byte on a rule that does not apply to it. A number that moved when the implementation changed: a first probe reported 1,181; the committed method reports 1,235. The method is right. The probe accumulated ok0/ok1 flags across candidate phases with an early-exit that could skip a phase which would have matched both bytes, and it also disagreed with bucket_rule on the byte-0 count (1,208 against 1,262), which is what gave it away. Recorded because both numbers came from the same run and only the discrepancy exposed the probe as wrong. The lesson is narrow: when a one-off probe and a committed helper disagree, check the probe first. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
79914c420e |
Show the chunk record's leading byte is a per-chunk phase counter; every chunk
has a uniform record length Follows the alignment result and settles what the leading byte is. Within one chunk the leading byte steps by a constant and wraps: offsets: 1420 1748 2072 2392 2716 3044 3372 3700 4028 4352 ... byte0: 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 ... Sweeping every (step, phase) over all 27 levels: fully explained: 1,262 of 1,509 chunks by step: 8 -> 51 chunks, 16 -> 554, 32 -> 520, 64 -> 137 unexplained: 247 chunks across 11 chunk types So on 1,262 chunks the leading byte carries no per-record information: it is a deterministic function of the record's index and the chunk's phase, which is a position marker rather than data. That is why the earlier "16 discrete values, uniform counts" pattern appeared at all. ResolvedChunk::bucket_rule returns the (step, phase) when the whole chunk fits and None otherwise, so the 247 unexplained chunks stay distinguishable and nothing skips a leading byte on the strength of a rule that does not apply to it. Every chunk has a uniform record length: 1,509 of 1,509. Length varies BETWEEN chunks of a type -- one type runs 76 to 104 bytes -- but never within one. This withdraws the previous commit's "variable-length type", which came from pooling minlen/maxlen across all of a type's records at once. That is the pooled-claim error rule 3a exists to prevent, and it is the third time this session a pooled measurement produced a claim that partitioning reversed. The type is not variable-length; the chunk is fixed-length and different chunks differ. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
a9bf74fc10 |
Characterise all 77 chunk types: record byte 0 is a bucket index, not data
Characterised every chunk type -- 77 of them, 1,509 chunks, 34,491 records, all 27 levels. Byte 0 of every record is a small aligned index, not record content. It takes 16 discrete values per chunk type (0x00, 0x10, ... 0xf0) with near-uniform counts WITHIN each type. Uniform weighting is the tell: a running byte offset would weight the buckets unevenly, because records differ in size. type_id recs len byte0 0x007d7ec438 2430 328 0x00:162 0x10:162 0x20:162 ... 0xf0:135 0x00429ec43d 2079 368 0x00:162 0x10:135 0x20:135 ... 0xf0:108 0x00d76cc453 810 108 0x00:27 0x08:27 0x10:27 ... 0xe8:27 <- steps by 8 The alignment step is per type, not global. The leading byte is a multiple of 8 on 34,432 of 34,491 records but a multiple of 16 on only 33,349 -- the 1,142-record difference falls in seven types, four of which step by 8. 59 records in three types break even the 8-byte rule, and that is where the variable-length type lives: 0x00f2ef4275, records 76 to 104 bytes, no single stride to align to. What the bucket indexes is NOT named. It is reported as CHUNK_RECORD_ALIGNMENT and record_is_aligned rather than as a parsed field, because naming it would be a guess while the invariant is solid. The test pins the exact exception set -- 59 records across 3 types -- so a change there fails loudly. A measurement I initially got wrong: the first version of the constant claimed a 16-byte multiple on 34,432 records. 34,432 is the multiple-of-8 count; the multiple-of-16 count is 33,349. Right number, wrong label, and the test caught it. That is the second time this session a correct number carried a wrong label, after the tie four-value retraction. Both times the assertion did, which is the argument for putting these numbers in tests rather than only in prose. Still open: what the bucket indexes, and the remaining record fields. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
291153a0d9 |
Find the tie LOD block terminator; packets == 0 means no block at that LOD
parse_tie_block walks to a 0xf6 terminator that every real block carries, on
2177 of 2177 across all 27 levels, followed by zero padding. This is what makes
the blocks parseable: packets[1] bounds one on only 461 of 1864 classes, so the
terminator is the only general way to find one.
The terminator was worth a control, because 0xf6 could have been byte-frequency
coincidence. It occurs in payloads at 0.83x the uniform rate -- slightly LESS
often than chance -- while the last non-zero byte is 0xf6 on 909 of 922 blocks in
the first subset, against 17 of 922 for the same blocks cut at a random point. So
it is a terminator, not a common byte.
packets == 0 means the class has NO block at that LOD: of 3,728 (class, LOD)
slots, 2177 point at a block and 1551 are exactly zero.
Corrected header, over all 2177:
+0x00 count multiple of 16 on all; 42 distinct; never zero
+0x02 zero on all
+0x04 exactly four values: 0x501 (1069), 0xa02 (720), 0xf03 (350),
0x1404 (38)
+0x06 16 distinct, never zero
+0x08 180 distinct, never zero
+0x0a 61 distinct, never zero
+0x0c 125 distinct, never zero, clustered 0x043f..0x0443
+0x0e 11 distinct, zero on 2162 -- the only non-universal field
+0x0c clusters around 1087-1091, close enough to a block length to be worth
stating, but it is NOT the length: the difference against the true payload length
scatters from -12 to -172.
A correction to the previous commit. It reported 3,728 blocks all terminating and
packed_texture taking 842 distinct values, and on that basis retracted the
four-value claim. Both numbers were wrong the same way: the scan did not skip
packets == 0, so it computed class_base + 0 and walked forward from the CLASS
BODY, finding a terminator there by accident. That contaminated 1551 of the 3728.
With the zeros excluded the slot takes exactly four values on all 2177 blocks.
The four-value claim was right; my retraction of it was wrong; and the retraction
was made on a number from the same contaminated set. A retraction is not
automatically better than the claim it retracts -- it needs its own bounds.
Still open: the payload's records. Established this round: blocks are
self-delimiting, absent LODs are marked by a zero packets word, and the header is
fully characterised. Not established: any record boundary inside the payload,
which stays variable-length.
|
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
02342de31b |
Decode the tie LOD block header; establish the payload is variable-length
TieBlockHeader parses the block's own 16 bytes, measured over the 922 blocks where "the next packets offset ends this block" holds, across all 27 levels. A real-disc test asserts every figure. +0x00 count multiple of 16 on 922/922; 16..2096; 72 distinct disc-wide +0x02 zero on 922/922 +0x04 ONE OF FOUR VALUES DISC-WIDE: 0x501, 0xa02, 0xf03, 0x1404 +0x06 15 distinct, 0x0206..0x0512 +0x08 135 distinct, 0x0b05..0x4ee4 +0x0a 45 distinct +0x0c 94 distinct, 0x010e..0x0553 +0x0e zero on 914/922 +0x04 is packed rather than a magnitude: four values across the whole disc with the two bytes moving independently, low 1-4 and high 5/10/15/20 in lockstep. That it is a texture index paired with a scale is a guess; that it is two fields is not. The count is not a record count -- block_size minus the header is divisible by it on 0 of 922, for any record size and any header up to 512 bytes. On the payload, a control was needed and changed the answer. Reading blocks as 3 x f32 triples, 53-64% of reads land within +/-5000 of origin, against 16% for a uniform-random control of identical length. So the content is float-shaped and genuinely not random. But the rate is flat across every start offset and every stride tried, 53-65% throughout. A statistic that cannot separate the right stride from the wrong one cannot identify a stride -- rule 4's exact case. Flatness plus a count that does not tile means the records are variable length. That killed two readings. A VIF1 command walk consumes 0 of 88 blocks exactly, so it is not a VIF1 CPU-format stream. wad::decompress rejects the block at every start offset, so it is not WAD LZ77. Scanning every (start, stride) pair from 0x10 to 0x7f for byte positions with a small distinct-value vocabulary finds none: every position takes all 256 values at every alignment. For float payload that is expected, so the scan found nothing rather than confirming anything -- worth saying, because "no fields found" here is uninformative, not evidence against fields. Still open: what the payload holds. Established: variable-length, float-shaped, non-random, not LZ77, not VIF1. Not established: any record boundary. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
881fd48e9a |
Withdraw the 16-byte tie record claim: block size is a multiple of 16, not records
The previous commit inferred a 16-byte record from "922 of 922 consecutive block sizes are a multiple of 16". That inference does not hold, and the claim is withdrawn rather than softened. What survives: - Every one of those 922 blocks opens with a u32 that is positive and a multiple of 4, on 922 of 922, ranging 48 to 1744 with 17 distinct values across level 0's LOD0 blocks. The block opens with a count, not a size and not a pointer. - Reading that u32 as a byte size and chaining to the next block lands exactly on the next block start on 0 of 1383 blocks. Not a size chain. - Assuming [header][count][count uniform records] and solving for the record size gives no answer: no record size tiles the block for any header size up to 512 bytes. Not 16, not 12, not 8. - Reading the block as uniform 16-byte units gives fields spanning their entire legal range -- u32@0 from -2139029504 to 2139029587, u16@8 and u16@10 both 0..65535, and 8969 distinct values in i16@0 on level 0. Uniform units would not produce that. So the 16 is a property of the block size, not of a record. The earlier commit also claimed a record size "on the classes where it can be measured"; those classes are still correctly identified, but what they measure is the block size. The strict-increase disproof from two commits ago stands untouched and is what should have prevented this: the word at +0 was already known not to behave, so treating 16-byte units as records contradicted a measurement sitting in the same file. Divisibility is arithmetic; it is not evidence of a record boundary. Roadmap updated to say block sizes are established and the record layout is not, with the three measurements that rule the 16-byte reading out. |
||
|
ReaperOfVeriod
|
855e640f39 |
Establish the 16-byte tie record on measurable classes; packets[0] is a constant
The previous commit reported "3580 non-empty LOD blocks compute as divisible by 16" and then said the figure should not be trusted, because it came from the "next packets offset ends this block" rule. That rule is unsound: packets is strictly increasing on only 461 of 1864 classes. On the other 1403 the two offsets are unordered and cannot both be block starts into one ascending region. Restricting to the 461 classes where the rule does hold, 922 of 922 consecutive block sizes are a multiple of 16. That is the evidence for a 16-byte record, and it is now scoped to the subset where it can be checked rather than claimed over all 1864. The other 1403 are unmeasured, not measured-and-different. packets[0] is a constant, not an offset: it reads 256 on 1864 of 1864 classes, while packets[1] and packets[2] vary widely and land at different addresses in core_data on every class. Read as a block start, 256 points just past the 0x48-byte header -- which is how it was being used, and exactly how a field gets mistaken for a pointer. It is now TIE_PACKETS0 and nothing depends on it. Still not decoded: what the 16 bytes hold. i16[0] at +4 takes 8969 distinct values on level 0 and is not the two-valued field a 12-unit sample suggested; the word at +0 is not a run offset. The test pins all four numbers -- packets[0] constant, the 922/922 divisibility, the 461/1864 ordering, and the 0/1864 monotonic disproof -- and asserts that the ordering is *not* universal, so a future change there fails loudly instead of quietly invalidating the record size. |